Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr;39(4):407-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1574-8.

[Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint]

[Article in German]
C-E Heyde et al. Orthopade. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

The altered trabecular structure of the osteoporotic spine leads to an increased vulnerability of its biomechanical characteristics and reduction of load resistance. Therefore, any surgical procedure must account for these circumstances. In cement-augmented vertebrae, both the overall stability and load transfer to the adjacent structures are influenced by a variety of factors. This has been demonstrated by different findings regarding volume, special characteristics, choice of approach and application, as well as distribution of the cement within the vertebral body. Independent of the well-known good clinical results, these features leave the discussion regarding the most appropriate form of cement-augmenting technique open. In cases where implants are required, there are increasing data to allow for an appropriate choice of stabilizing devices to fit the biomechanical demands in poor bone quality. Thereby, multilevel instrumentation, additive stabilization techniques, cement-augmented pedicle screws and adapted implant designs ensure and increase patient safety. However, regardless of the procedure chosen to stabilize the osteoporotic spine, reconstruction of the column profile appears to be of pre-eminent importance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Osteoporos Int. 1993 Jan;3(1):8-12 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep;18(9):1271-8 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 1;27(9):937-42 - PubMed
    1. Int Orthop. 2004 Apr;28(2):106-9 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):47-53 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources