Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr;85(4):358-64.
doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0652.

Responsible use of computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease and chest pain

David E Winchester  1 , David C Wymer, Roger Y Shifrin, Steven M Kraft, James A Hill
Affiliations
Review

Responsible use of computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease and chest pain

David E Winchester et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Many options are available to clinicians for the noninvasive evaluation of the cardiovascular system and patient concerns about chest discomfort. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is a rapidly advancing field of noninvasive imaging. Computed tomography incorporates coronary artery calcium scoring, coronary angiography, ventricular functional analysis, and information about noncardiac thoracic anatomy. We searched the PubMed database and Google from inception to September 2009 for resources on the accuracy, risk, and predictive capacity of coronary artery calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography and have reviewed them herein. Cardiac CT provides diagnostic information comparable to echocardiography, nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. A cardiac CT study can be completed in minutes. In patients with a nondiagnostic stress test result, cardiac CT can preclude the need for invasive angiography. Prognostic information portends excellent outcomes in patients with normal study results. Use of cardiac CT can reduce health care costs and length of emergency department stays for patients with chest pain. Cardiac CT examination provides clinically relevant information at a radiation dose similar to well-established technologies, such as nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Advances in technique can reduce radiation dose by 90%. With appropriate patient selection, cardiac CT can accurately diagnose heart disease, markedly decrease health care costs, and reliably predict clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE.
FIGURE.
Responsible use of cardiac computed tomography in evaluating chest pain. This flow diagram incorporates coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in a suggested framework for evaluating a patient with acute chest pain. See the American Heart Association criteria for further detail on the assessment of pretest probability. CAD = coronary artery disease; ECG = electrocardiogram; echo = echocardiography; SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography. Data from J Am Coll Radiol.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Karstaedt N, et al. Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(1):55-71 - PubMed
    1. Lanzer P, Garrett J, Lipton MJ, et al. Quantitation of regional myocardial function by cine computed tomography: pharmacologic changes in wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8(3):682-692 - PubMed
    1. Miller JC, Abbara S, Mamuya WS, Thrall JH, Uppot RN. Dual-source CT for cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6(1):65-68 - PubMed
    1. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007;245(3):703-711 - PubMed
    1. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827-832 - PubMed

MeSH terms