Contribution of company affiliation and social contacts to risk estimates of between-farm transmission of avian influenza
- PMID: 20360859
- PMCID: PMC2845626
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009888
Contribution of company affiliation and social contacts to risk estimates of between-farm transmission of avian influenza
Abstract
Background: Models of between-farm transmission of pathogens have identified service vehicles and social groups as risk factors mediating the spread of infection. Because of high levels of economic organization in much of the poultry industry, we examined the importance of company affiliation, as distinct from social contacts, in a model of the potential spread of avian influenza among broiler poultry farms in a poultry-dense region in the United States. The contribution of company affiliation to risk of between-farm disease transmission has not been previously studied.
Methodology/principal findings: We obtained data on the nature and frequency of business and social contacts through a national survey of broiler poultry growers in the United States. Daily rates of contact were estimated using Monte Carlo analysis. Stochastic modeling techniques were used to estimate the exposure risk posed by a single infectious farm to other farms in the region and relative risk of exposure for farms under different scenarios. The mean daily rate of vehicular contact was 0.82 vehicles/day. The magnitude of exposure risk ranged from <1% to 25% under varying parameters. Risk of between-farm transmission was largely driven by company affiliation, with farms in the same company group as the index farm facing as much as a 5-fold increase in risk compared to farms contracted with different companies. Employment of part-time workers contributed to significant increases in risk in most scenarios, notably for farms who hired day-laborers. Social visits were significantly less important in determining risk.
Conclusions/significance: Biosecurity interventions should be based on information on industry structure and company affiliation, and include part-time workers as potentially unrecognized sources of viral transmission. Modeling efforts to understand pathogen transmission in the context of industrial food animal production should consider company affiliation in addition to geospatial factors and pathogen characteristics. Restriction of social contacts among farmers may be less useful in reducing between-farm transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Contact structure and potential risk factors for avian influenza transmission among open-sided chicken farms in Kamalia, an important poultry rearing area of Pakistan.Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2012 Mar-Apr;125(3-4):110-6. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2012. PMID: 22515028
-
Analysis of geographic location and pathways for influenza A virus infection of commercial upland game bird and conventional poultry farms in the United States of America.BMC Vet Res. 2019 May 14;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1876-y. BMC Vet Res. 2019. PMID: 31088548 Free PMC article.
-
Risk maps for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry.PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Apr 20;3(4):e71. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030071. Epub 2007 Mar 5. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007. PMID: 17447838 Free PMC article.
-
[Avian influenza: eradication from commercial poultry is still not in sight].Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2004 Dec 1;129(23):782-96. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2004. PMID: 15624878 Review. Dutch.
-
Biosecurity Implications, Transmission Routes and Modes of Economically Important Diseases in Domestic Fowl and Turkey.Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 21;12(4):391. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040391. Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40284893 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tracking socioeconomic vulnerability using network analysis: insights from an avian influenza outbreak in an ostrich production network.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e86973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086973. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24498004 Free PMC article.
-
Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8399-404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208059110. Epub 2013 May 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 23671097 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and remaining gaps on the role of animal and human movements in the poultry production and trade networks in the global spread of avian influenza viruses - A scoping review.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0230567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230567. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32196515 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial-resistant Bacteria: An Unrecognized Work-related Risk in Food Animal Production.Saf Health Work. 2012 Jun;3(2):85-91. doi: 10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.2.85. Epub 2012 Jun 8. Saf Health Work. 2012. PMID: 22993711 Free PMC article.
-
A metapopulation model for highly pathogenic avian influenza: implications for compartmentalization as a control measure.Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Sep;142(9):1813-25. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813002963. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Epidemiol Infect. 2014. PMID: 24308445 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smith GJ, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Lycett SJ, Worobey M, et al. Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature. 2009;459(7250):1122–5. - PubMed
-
- Ma W, Lager KM, Vincent AL, Janke BH, Gramer MR, et al. The role of swine in the generation of novel influenza viruses. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009 May 20. [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
-
- Gray GC, Kayali G. Facing pandemic influenza threats: The importance of including poultry and swine workers in preparedness plans. Poult Sci. 2009;88(4):880–884. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical