Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Jun;117(6):663-73.
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180102020.

Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis

Affiliations
Review

Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis

M W van den Brekel et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991 Dec;117(12):1410

Abstract

In a series of 100 patients with head and neck carcinoma, the preoperative histopathologic findings of palpation and magnetic resonance imaging were compared with regard to both laterality and lymph node level (I through V). The overall error for palpation in detecting affected sides was 32%. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images reliably upgraded 60% of the clinically negative necks, the overall error of magnetic resonance imaging being 16%. However, for both modalities, the sensitivity per level was too low to allow for selective neck dissections in case of only one positive level. These findings show that apart from primary tumor grading, magnetic resonance imaging can improve the preoperative grading of cervical lymph nodes. In selected cases, this may change the treatment plan to a "wait-and-see" policy or a more conservative type of neck dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources