Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis
- PMID: 2036191
- DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180102020
Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis
Erratum in
- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991 Dec;117(12):1410
Abstract
In a series of 100 patients with head and neck carcinoma, the preoperative histopathologic findings of palpation and magnetic resonance imaging were compared with regard to both laterality and lymph node level (I through V). The overall error for palpation in detecting affected sides was 32%. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images reliably upgraded 60% of the clinically negative necks, the overall error of magnetic resonance imaging being 16%. However, for both modalities, the sensitivity per level was too low to allow for selective neck dissections in case of only one positive level. These findings show that apart from primary tumor grading, magnetic resonance imaging can improve the preoperative grading of cervical lymph nodes. In selected cases, this may change the treatment plan to a "wait-and-see" policy or a more conservative type of neck dissection.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical palpation in evaluating cervical metastasis from head and neck cancer.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Sep;123(3):324-7. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105252. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000. PMID: 10964315
-
[Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].Laryngorhinootologie. 2000 Apr;79(4):201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8795. Laryngorhinootologie. 2000. PMID: 10838683 German.
-
Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00176941. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993. PMID: 8466744
-
Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck.J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Sep-Oct;7(5):774-83. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070503. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997. PMID: 9307901 Review.
-
Imaging of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: the basics.Radiol Clin North Am. 2006 Jan;44(1):101-10, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2005.08.006. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 16297684 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of ipsilateral lower neck sparing irradiation for unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma: systemic review and meta-analysis of 2, 521 patients.Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1087-x. Radiat Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30081932 Free PMC article.
-
Neck dissection alternatives.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Oct;49(4):323-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02994644. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997. PMID: 23119322 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Application of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma.J Oncol. 2022 Nov 12;2022:6356399. doi: 10.1155/2022/6356399. eCollection 2022. J Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36411795 Free PMC article.
-
[Value of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in radiotherapy planning of head-neck tumors].Strahlenther Onkol. 1998 Jul;174(7):358-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03038350. Strahlenther Onkol. 1998. PMID: 9689957 German.
-
Occult node metastases in head and neck squamous carcinoma.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250(8):446-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00181087. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993. PMID: 8129923
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical