Suppression of deep brain stimulation artifacts from the electroencephalogram by frequency-domain Hampel filtering
- PMID: 20362499
- PMCID: PMC2924738
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.156
Suppression of deep brain stimulation artifacts from the electroencephalogram by frequency-domain Hampel filtering
Abstract
Objective: Currently, electroencephalography (EEG) cannot be used to record cortical activity during clinically effective DBS due to the presence of large stimulation artifact with components that overlap the useful spectrum of the EEG. A filtering method is presented that removes these artifacts whilst preserving the spectral and temporal fidelity of the underlying EEG.
Methods: The filter is based on the Hampel identifier that treats artifacts as outliers in the frequency domain and replaces them with interpolated values. Performance of the filter was tested with a synthesized DBS signal and actual data recorded during bilateral monopolar DBS.
Results: Mean increases in signal-to-noise ratio of 7.8dB for single-frequency stimulation and 13.8dB for dual-frequency stimulation are reported. Correlation analysis between EEG with synthesized artifacts and artifact-free EEG reveals that distortion to the underlying EEG in the filtered signal is negligible (r(2)>0.99).
Conclusions: Frequency-domain Hampel filtering has been shown to remove monopolar DBS artifacts under a number of common stimulation conditions used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Significance: Application of frequency-domain Hampel filtering will allow the measurement of EEG in patients during clinically effective DBS and thus may increase our understanding of the mechanisms of action of this important therapeutic intervention.
Copyright 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Removing deep brain stimulation artifacts from the electroencephalogram: Issues, recommendations and an open-source toolbox.Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Oct;129(10):2170-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 13. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30144660 Review.
-
A novel method for removal of deep brain stimulation artifact from electroencephalography.J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Nov 30;237:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 8. J Neurosci Methods. 2014. PMID: 25218560
-
DBS artifact suppression using a time-frequency domain filter.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:4815-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610625. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013. PMID: 24110812
-
Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:408-424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 12. Neuroimage. 2019. PMID: 30321643 Free PMC article.
-
EEG and MEG primers for tracking DBS network effects.Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117447. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117447. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Neuroimage. 2021. PMID: 33059051 Review.
Cited by
-
Entropy of eye movement during rapid automatized naming.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 4;16:945406. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.945406. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36034115 Free PMC article.
-
PELP: Accounting for Missing Data in Neural Time Series by Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 7;16:934063. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.934063. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35874161 Free PMC article.
-
Time-frequency signatures evoked by single-pulse deep brain stimulation to the subcallosal cingulate.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;16:939258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.939258. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36061500 Free PMC article.
-
A Study on the Feasibility of the Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Electrode Localization Based on Scalp Electric Potential Recordings.Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 4;9:1788. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01788. eCollection 2018. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30662407 Free PMC article.
-
Signal recovery from stimulation artifacts in intracranial recordings with dictionary learning.J Neural Eng. 2020 Apr 9;17(2):026023. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7a4f. J Neural Eng. 2020. PMID: 32103828 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen DP. A frequency domain Hampel filter for blind rejection of sinusoidal interference from electromyograms. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;177:303–310. - PubMed
-
- Ashby P, Paradiso G, Saint-Cyr JA, Chen R, Lang AE, Lozano AM. Potentials recorded at the scalp by stimulation near the human subthalamic nucleus. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:431–437. - PubMed
-
- Baker KB, Montgomery EB, Jr, Rezai AR, Burgess R, Luders HO. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulus evoked potentials: physiological and therapeutic implications. Mov Disord. 2002;17:969–983. - PubMed
-
- Brown P. Oscillatory nature of human basal ganglia activity: relationship to the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2003;18:357–363. - PubMed
-
- Ceballos-Baumann AO, Boecker H, Bartenstein P, von Falkenhayn I, Riescher H, Conrad B, Moringlane JR, Alesch F. A positron emission tomographic study of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease: enhanced movement-related activity of motor-association cortex and decreased motor cortex resting activity. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:997–1003. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical