Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates
- PMID: 20363418
 - DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.008
 
Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates
Abstract
Background: According to national recommendations, colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) on negative screening examinations should average more than 6 minutes because this time is associated with a higher rate of polyp detection. Attempts have been made to increase the WT; however, simply knowing that a quality measure, such as the WT, is being monitored, by itself, may improve the quality of an examination.
Objective: To measure changes in the polyp detection rate associated with recording the WT.
Design: Retrospective.
Setting: Single tertiary care center.
Patients: Patients undergoing colonoscopy within 5 months immediately before (group A) and after (group B) initiation of WT recording. Colonoscopies were excluded if procedure times were incomplete, missing, or nonsensical.
Main outcome measurements: Polyp detection, compared by using the chi(2) test and logistic regression multivariate analyses; pathology manually reviewed from a sample of 200 consecutive polyp cases (100 per group).
Results: The average WT in group B was 14.5 minutes (11.0 minutes in negative screening examinations). In group A, polyps were detected in 530 (37.7%) of 1405 colonoscopies compared with 571 (41.2%) of 1387 colonoscopies in group B (difference 3.5%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.1%), a nonsignificant 9.3% relative increase. Longer procedure time, age, sex, and indication were significant predictors; monitoring the WT was not. Nonsignificantly, more polyp examinations in group B found all nonadenomas compared with group A (36% vs 27%; P = .17), and polyps were nonsignificantly smaller (P = .30).
Limitations: Retrospective database data, pathology performed only on a subsample.
Conclusion: WT recording was associated with a nonsignificant increase in polyp detection, but this was likely attributable to a slight increase in the detection of (smaller) nonadenomatous polyps.
Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
- 
  
  Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):787-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.060. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363419 No abstract available.
 - 
  
  Inflationary caution in GI endoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):789-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.044. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363420 No abstract available.
 - 
  
  Utility of colonoscopy withdrawal time measurement in the setting of an adequate adenoma detection rate.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):189; author reply 189-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.025. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21184888 No abstract available.
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
