Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates
- PMID: 20363418
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.008
Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates
Abstract
Background: According to national recommendations, colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) on negative screening examinations should average more than 6 minutes because this time is associated with a higher rate of polyp detection. Attempts have been made to increase the WT; however, simply knowing that a quality measure, such as the WT, is being monitored, by itself, may improve the quality of an examination.
Objective: To measure changes in the polyp detection rate associated with recording the WT.
Design: Retrospective.
Setting: Single tertiary care center.
Patients: Patients undergoing colonoscopy within 5 months immediately before (group A) and after (group B) initiation of WT recording. Colonoscopies were excluded if procedure times were incomplete, missing, or nonsensical.
Main outcome measurements: Polyp detection, compared by using the chi(2) test and logistic regression multivariate analyses; pathology manually reviewed from a sample of 200 consecutive polyp cases (100 per group).
Results: The average WT in group B was 14.5 minutes (11.0 minutes in negative screening examinations). In group A, polyps were detected in 530 (37.7%) of 1405 colonoscopies compared with 571 (41.2%) of 1387 colonoscopies in group B (difference 3.5%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.1%), a nonsignificant 9.3% relative increase. Longer procedure time, age, sex, and indication were significant predictors; monitoring the WT was not. Nonsignificantly, more polyp examinations in group B found all nonadenomas compared with group A (36% vs 27%; P = .17), and polyps were nonsignificantly smaller (P = .30).
Limitations: Retrospective database data, pathology performed only on a subsample.
Conclusion: WT recording was associated with a nonsignificant increase in polyp detection, but this was likely attributable to a slight increase in the detection of (smaller) nonadenomatous polyps.
Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):787-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.060. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363419 No abstract available.
-
Inflationary caution in GI endoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):789-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.044. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363420 No abstract available.
-
Utility of colonoscopy withdrawal time measurement in the setting of an adequate adenoma detection rate.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):189; author reply 189-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.025. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21184888 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):787-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.060. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363419 No abstract available.
-
Inflationary caution in GI endoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):789-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.044. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363420 No abstract available.
-
Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.008. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20970795
-
Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations: issues, yields, and use.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;98(6):1237-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07492.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12818263 Review.
-
[Interval colon cancer and possible causes].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Nov;133(47):2458-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100939. Epub 2008 Nov 12. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008. PMID: 19006045 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Zero-inflated models for the evaluation of colorectal polyps in colon cancer screening studies-a value-based biostatistics practice.PeerJ. 2025 May 26;13:e19504. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19504. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40444286 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 12;35(6):488-496. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39114910 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;14(1):115-27. doi: 10.1007/s11938-016-0073-3. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26810839
-
Is there a difference in adenoma detection rates between gastroenterologists and surgeons?World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun 16;10(6):109-116. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i6.109. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29988847 Free PMC article.
-
Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May 16;6(5):186-92. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.186. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24891931 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical