The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia
- PMID: 2036794
- DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90142-3
The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia
Abstract
The present study is the first randomized ten-year comparison of the standard, non-medicated Lippes Loop D and the same device with the addition of 200 mm2 of copper in the form of copper sleeves. The devices were randomly inserted immediately after first trimester medical termination of pregnancy. Out of 400 postabortal IUD insertions, 371 were followed for up to ten years. Gross cumulative life-table accidental pregnancy rates after one year of use were 0.56 for the copper-bearing Lippes Loop and 4.63 for the standard Lippes Loop. After two, four and ten years, these rates were 1.24, 2.70 and 3.62 and 6.03, 7.58 and 14.94, respectively (in all comparisons, rates were significantly different at the 0.05 level or lower). At each time interval, expulsion/displacement rates were 4.49, 4.49, 5.23 and 6.32 for the copper-bearing Lippes Loop and 12.61, 13.29, 15.46 and 19.79 for the standard Lippes Loop (rates were significantly different at the 0.01 level or lower). Differences in removal rates for bleeding and/or pain were not significantly different at any of the follow-up intervals. The lower event rates for copper-bearing Lippes Loop D users indicates that the addition of copper to the Lippes Loop IUD may result in better long-term efficacy profiles for this device among postabortal women. The results also suggest that large, medicated IUDs may be more efficacious for women with larger uteri who often experience higher failure rates due to expulsion or displacement of smaller IUDs into the lower uterine segment.
Similar articles
-
Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries.Contraception. 1995 Jul;52(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00119-u. Contraception. 1995. PMID: 8521710 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989 Jun;29(2):173-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90849-7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989. PMID: 2568294
-
Interval iud insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220c and the Copper 7.Contraception. 1982 Jul;26(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(82)90167-6. Contraception. 1982. PMID: 7128130 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of IUDs: a review.Contraception. 1987 Jul;36(1):55-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90061-8. Contraception. 1987. PMID: 3311626 Review.
-
An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.Contraception. 1991 Dec;44(6):573-88. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90078-t. Contraception. 1991. PMID: 1773615 Review.
Cited by
-
Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 28;2014(7):CD001777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001777.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25101364 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources