Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;32(1):62-68.
doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34407-3.

Supracervical hysterectomy

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Supracervical hysterectomy

Sari Kives et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the potential benefits of the vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with respect to postoperative sexual function, urinary function, and peri- and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic options are not included in this guideline.

Options: Women considering hysterectomy for benign disease can be given the option of retaining the cervix or proceeding with a total hysterectomy.

Outcomes: The outcomes measured are postoperative sexual function and urinary function, and peri- and postoperative complications.

Evidence: The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase were searched for articles published in English from January 1950 to March 2008 specifically comparing VH and SCH with TAH in the prevention of sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and peri- and postoperative complications. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Randomized controlled trials were considered evidence of the highest quality, followed by cohort studies. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table).

Recommendations: 1. Vaginal hysterectomy is generally considered the first choice of surgical approach for most benign indications for hysterectomy, as it is associated with lower rates of morbidity, fewer postoperative complications, and a faster recovery time than abdominal hysterectomy. (I-A). 2. Women contemplating a vaginal, laparoscopic, or abdominal hysterectomy for the management of benign uterine disease should be reassured that hysterectomy is usually associated with improved quality of life, including improved sexual function, whether or not the cervix is removed. (I-B). 3. Supracervical hysterectomy should not be recommended as a superior technique to total abdominal hysterectomy for the prevention of postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms. (I-B). 4. Although supracervical hysterectomy may be associated with less blood loss and a shorter surgical time, these parameters have not been found to be clinically significant, and supracervical hysterectomy should not be recommended as a superior technique to total abdominal hysterectomy for the prevention of peri- and postoperative complications. (I-B). 5. Women considering a supracervical hysterectomy should be counselled that they may continue experiencing cyclic vaginal bleeding following the surgery. (I-B). 6. Women must be advised that they require routine cytological screening following a supracervical hysterectomy. (II-B). 7. Women who require a hysterectomy and who have a current or significant history of abnormal cervical cytological results should be counselled on the advantages of vaginal hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy over supracervical hysterectomy. (I-B).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • No. 238-Supracervical Hysterectomy.
    Kives S, Lefebvre G. Kives S, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):e597-e604. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.033. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018. PMID: 29921438
  • The management of uterine leiomyomas.
    Vilos GA, Allaire C, Laberge PY, Leyland N; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. Vilos GA, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37(2):157-178. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30338-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 25767949
  • Endometrial ablation in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding.
    Laberge P, Leyland N, Murji A, Fortin C, Martyn P, Vilos G; Clinical Practice-Gynaecology Committee; Leyland N, Wolfman W, Allaire C, Awadalla A, Dunn S, Heywood M, Lemyre M, Marcoux V, Potestio F, Rittenberg D, Singh S, Yeung G; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Laberge P, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Apr;37(4):362-79. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30288-7. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26001691
  • Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
    Jenkins TR. Jenkins TR. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;191(6):1875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.096. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15592268 Review.
  • The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease.
    Money D, Allen VM; INFECTIOUS DISEASES COMMITTEE. Money D, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30818-5. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013. PMID: 24165063 Review.

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources