Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation
- PMID: 20374141
- DOI: 10.1086/593706
Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation
Abstract
Interactions between gene flow, spatially variable selection, and genetic drift have long been a central focus of evolutionary research. In contrast, only recently has the potential importance of interactions between these factors for coevolutionary dynamics and the emergence of parasite local adaptation been realized. Here we study host-parasite coevolution in a metapopulation model when both the biotic and the abiotic components of the environment vary in space. We provide a general expression for parasite local adaptation that allows local adaptation to be partitioned into the contributions of spatial covariances between host and parasite genotype frequencies within and between habitats. This partitioning clarifies how relative rates of gene flow, spatially variable patterns of selection, and genetic drift interact to shape parasite local adaptation. Specifically, by using this expression in conjunction with coevolutionary models, we show that genetic drift can dramatically increase the level of parasite local adaptation under some models of specificity. We also show that the effect of migration on parasite local adaptation depends on the geographic mosaic of selection. We discuss how these predictions could be tested empirically or experimentally using microbial systems.
Similar articles
-
Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic.Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):24-30. Evolution. 2006. PMID: 16568628
-
Population structure and the co-evolution between social parasites and their hosts.Mol Ecol. 2007 May;16(10):2063-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03300.x. Mol Ecol. 2007. PMID: 17498232
-
Polygenic traits and parasite local adaptation.Evolution. 2007 Feb;61(2):368-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00029.x. Evolution. 2007. PMID: 17348946
-
Evolution of spatially structured host-parasite interactions.J Evol Biol. 2015 Jan;28(1):10-28. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12551. Epub 2015 Jan 8. J Evol Biol. 2015. PMID: 25439133 Review.
-
Environment can alter selection in host-parasite interactions.Trends Parasitol. 2009 May;25(5):236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Apr 6. Trends Parasitol. 2009. PMID: 19356982 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatial heterogeneity lowers rather than increases host-parasite specialization.J Evol Biol. 2015 Sep;28(9):1682-90. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12689. Epub 2015 Jul 22. J Evol Biol. 2015. PMID: 26135011 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of epistasis on infectivity range during host-parasite coevolution.Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):2972-82. doi: 10.1111/evo.12479. Epub 2014 Jul 25. Evolution. 2014. PMID: 24957848 Free PMC article.
-
The role of evolutionary biology in research and control of liver flukes in Southeast Asia.Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Sep;43:381-97. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.019. Epub 2016 May 16. Infect Genet Evol. 2016. PMID: 27197053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic diversity and differentiation of populations of Chlorops oryzae (Diptera, Chloropidae).BMC Ecol. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12898-020-00293-8. BMC Ecol. 2020. PMID: 32295587 Free PMC article.
-
Host population bottlenecks drive parasite extinction during antagonistic coevolution.Evolution. 2016 Jan;70(1):235-40. doi: 10.1111/evo.12837. Epub 2015 Dec 30. Evolution. 2016. PMID: 26661325 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources