Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;334(1):347-56.
doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.168435. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Rimonabant-induced Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol withdrawal in rhesus monkeys: discriminative stimulus effects and other withdrawal signs

Affiliations

Rimonabant-induced Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol withdrawal in rhesus monkeys: discriminative stimulus effects and other withdrawal signs

Jennifer L Stewart et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Marijuana-dependent individuals report using marijuana to alleviate withdrawal, suggesting that pharmacotherapy of marijuana withdrawal could promote abstinence. To identify potential pharmacotherapies for marijuana withdrawal, this study first characterized rimonabant-induced Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) withdrawal in rhesus monkeys by using drug discrimination and directly observable signs. Second, drugs were examined for their capacity to modify cannabinoid withdrawal. Monkeys receiving chronic Delta(9)-THC (1 mg/kg/12 h s.c.) discriminated the cannabinoid antagonist rimonabant (1 mg/kg i.v.) under a fixed ratio schedule of stimulus-shock termination. The discriminative stimulus effects of rimonabant were dose-dependent (ED(50) = 0.25 mg/kg) and accompanied by head shaking. In the absence of chronic Delta(9)-THC treatment (i.e., in nondependent monkeys), a larger dose (3.2 mg/kg) of rimonabant produced head shaking and tachycardia. Temporary discontinuation of Delta(9)-THC treatment resulted in increased responding on the rimonabant lever, head shaking, and activity during the dark cycle. The rimonabant discriminative stimulus was attenuated fully by Delta(9)-THC (at doses larger than mg/kg/12 h) and the cannabinoid agonist CP 55940 [5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]phenol], and partially by the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55212-2 [(R)-(+)-[2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate] and the alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist clonidine. In contrast, a benzodiazepine (diazepam) and monoamine agonist (cocaine) did not attenuate the rimonabant discriminative stimulus. Head shaking was attenuated by all test compounds. These results show that the discriminative stimulus effects of rimonabant in Delta(9)-THC-treated monkeys are a more pharmacologically selective measure of cannabinoid withdrawal than rimonabant-induced head shaking. These results suggest that cannabinoid and noncannabinoid (alpha(2)-adrenergic) agonists are potentially useful therapeutics for marijuana dependence inasmuch as they attenuate the subjective experience of Delta(9)-THC withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Discriminative stimulus effects of rimonabant (1 mg/kg) in rhesus monkeys receiving chronic Δ9-THC (1 mg/kg/12 h). Abscissae: vehicle (V) or dose in mg/kg body weight (A and C) and time (Min) after administration of the training dose (1 mg/kg) of rimonabant (B and D). Ordinates: mean (± S.E.M.) percentage of responding on the rimonabant lever (A and B) and mean (± S.E.M.) response rate expressed as a percentage of control (V training days) rate [rate (% control)] (C and D). *, p < 0.05 versus V.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Head shaking and heart rate produced by rimonabant in combination with chronic Δ9-THC treatment (Chronic Δ9-THC; ○) and without Δ9-THC (No chronic Δ9-THC; ●). Abscissae: vehicle (V) or dose in mg/kg body weight (A and C) and time (Min) after administration of 1 mg/kg rimonabant (B and D). Ordinates: mean (± S.E.M.) frequency of head shaking (A and B) and mean (± S.E.M.) change in heart rate (beats per min) from the nondrug control (C and D). *, p < 0.05 versus V, Chronic Δ9-THC. #, p < 0.05 versus V, No chronic Δ9-THC.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Discriminative and other behavioral effects resulting from abrupt discontinuation of chronic Δ9-THC (1 mg/kg/12 h) treatment. Abscissae: Consecutive days before (leftmost THC), during (Deprivation), and after (rightmost THC) temporary discontinuation of 1 mg/kg/12 h Δ9-THC. Ordinates: percentage of responding on the rimonabant lever (A), mean (± S.E.M.) response rate expressed as a percentage of control (vehicle training days) rate [rate (% control)] (B), mean (± S.E.M.) frequency of head shaking (C), and cumulative home cage activity during the night (D). *, p < 0.05 versus rightmost Δ9-THC point (i.e., predeprivation control).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Discriminative stimulus effects and head shaking after cannabinoid agonists, alone and in combination with rimonabant. Abscissae: dose in mg/kg body weight of cannabinoid agonist in combination with vehicle (V) (A–C) or rimonabant (1 mg/kg; R) (D–F). Ordinates: mean (± S.E.M.) percentage of responding on the rimonabant lever (A and D), mean (± S.E.M.) response rate expressed as a percentage of control (V alone) rate [rate (% control)] (B and E), and mean (± S.E.M.) head shaking expressed as a percentage of control (R alone) (C and F). *, p < 0.05 versus V or R in corresponding panels.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Discriminative stimulus effects and head shaking after noncannabinoids, alone and in combination with rimonabant. Abscissae: dose in mg/kg body weight of clonidine, cocaine, or diazepam in combination with vehicle (V) (A–C) or rimonabant (1 mg/kg; R) (D–F). Ordinates: mean (± S.E.M.) percentage of responding on the rimonabant lever (A and D), mean (± S.E.M.) response rate expressed as a percentage of control (V alone) rate [rate (% control)] (B and E), and mean (± S.E.M.) head shaking expressed as a percentage of control (R alone) (C and F). *, p < 0.05 versus V or R in corresponding panels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aceto MD, Scates SM, Lowe JA, Martin BR. (1996) Dependence on Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol: studies on precipitated and abrupt withdrawal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:1290–1295 - PubMed
    1. Beardsley PM, Balster RL, Harris LS. (1986) Dependence on tetrahydrocannabinol in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239:311–319 - PubMed
    1. Boisse NR, Okamoto M. (1978) Physical dependence to barbital compared to pentobarbital. IV. Influence of elimination kinetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 204:526–540 - PubMed
    1. Bouaboula M, Perrachon S, Milligan L, Canat X, Rinaldi-Carmona M, Portier M, Barth F, Calandra B, Pecceu F, Lupker J, et al. (1997) A selective inverse agonist for central cannabinoid receptor inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase activation stimulated by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1. Evidence for a new model of receptor/ligand interactions. J Biol Chem 272:22330–22339 - PubMed
    1. Budney AJ, Hughes JR, Moore BA, Vandrey R. (2004) Review of the validity and significance of cannabis withdrawal syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 161:1967–1977 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources