Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May;87(5):572-8.
doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.13. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing

P Lenzini et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May.

Abstract

Well-characterized genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9) and sensitivity (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)) explain one-third of the variability in therapeutic dose before the international normalized ratio (INR) is measured. To determine genotypic relevance after INR becomes available, we derived clinical and pharmacogenetic refinement algorithms on the basis of INR values (on day 4 or 5 of therapy), clinical factors, and genotype. After adjusting for INR, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes remained significant predictors (P < 0.001) of warfarin dose. The clinical algorithm had an R(2) of 48% (median absolute error (MAE): 7.0 mg/week) and the pharmacogenetic algorithm had an R(2) of 63% (MAE: 5.5 mg/week) in the derivation set (N = 969). In independent validation sets, the R(2) was 26-43% with the clinical algorithm and 42-58% when genotype was added (P = 0.002). After several days of therapy, a pharmacogenetic algorithm estimates the therapeutic warfarin dose more accurately than one using clinical factors and INR response alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pharmacogenetic predicted versus actual therapeutic doses in the internal and external validation cohorts (using an INR on day 4 of therapy)
Open circles represent individuals for whom no variants in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were detected. Grey circles represent individuals who are carrying one variant allele (either VKORC1-1639 A or a *2 or *3 allele. Black circles represent individuals with at least two variants. The ‘P’ was an individual taking phenytoin. The ‘R’ was an individual taking rifampin.

References

    1. Pirmohamed M. Warfarin: almost 60 years old and still causing problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;62:509–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budnitz DS, Pollock DA, Weidenbach KN, et al. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. Jama. 2006 Oct 18;296:1858–66. - PubMed
    1. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 9;167:1414–9. - PubMed
    1. Wester K, Jonsson AK, Spigset O, et al. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;65:573–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindh JD, Holm L, Dahl ML, et al. Incidence and predictors of severe bleeding during warfarin treatment. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Apr;25:151–9. - PubMed

Publication types