Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;25(2):130-6.
doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.36. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

Health-care costs of losartan and candesartan in the primary treatment of hypertension

Affiliations

Health-care costs of losartan and candesartan in the primary treatment of hypertension

M Henriksson et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

A recent study of two widely used angiotensin receptor blockers reported a reduced risk of cardiovascular events (-14.4%) when using candesartan compared with losartan in the primary treatment of hypertension. In addition to clinical benefits, costs associated with treatment strategies must be considered when allocating scarce health-care resources. The aim of this study was to assess resource use and costs of losartan and candesartan in hypertensive patients. Resource use (drugs, outpatient contacts, hospitalizations and laboratory tests) associated with losartan and candesartan treatment was estimated in 14,100 patients in a real-life clinical setting. We electronically extracted patient data from primary care records and mandatory Swedish national registers for death and hospitalization. Patients treated with losartan had more outpatient contacts (+15.6%), laboratory tests (+13.8%) and hospitalizations (+13.8%) compared with the candesartan group. During a maximum observation time of 9 years, the mean total costs per patient were 10,369 Swedish kronor (95% confidence interval: 3109-17,629) higher in the losartan group. In conclusion, prescribing candesartan for the primary treatment of hypertension results in lower long-term health-care costs compared with losartan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean total discounted health-care costs over time by treatment group. Numbers show the difference in mean total health-care costs (losartan compared with candesartan) with 95% CIs in brackets. SEK=Swedish kronor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean differences in total discounted health-care costs with various price reductions of generic losartan. Numbers show the difference in mean health-care costs (losartan compared with candesartan) with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. SEK=Swedish kronor.

References

    1. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA. 2003;289 (18:2363–2369. - PubMed
    1. Messerli FH, Williams B, Ritz E. Essential hypertension. Lancet. 2007;370 (9587:591–603. - PubMed
    1. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, de Faire U, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359 (9311:995–1003. - PubMed
    1. Jonsson B, Carides GW, Burke TA, Dasbach EJ, Lindholm LH, Dahlof B. Cost effectiveness of losartan in patients with hypertension and LVH: an economic evaluation for Sweden of the LIFE trial. J Hypertens. 2005;23 (7:1425–1431. - PubMed
    1. Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet. 2003;362 (9386:759–766. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms