Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;49(4):489-97.
doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2267-y.

[Prevention of postoperative urinary stress incontinence]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Prevention of postoperative urinary stress incontinence]

[Article in German]
M A Reiter et al. Urologe A. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Postoperative stress incontinence following operative treatment of prostate cancer represents a considerable percentage of overall male incontinence. Postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy ranges between 2.9 and 87% depending on author and patient characteristics. Especially patient-related factors such as body mass index, age, size of prostate, preoperative incontinence, and concomitant diseases as well as classification of incontinence and modality of data collection influence postoperative continence rates. However, recent publications demonstrate the important impact of different operative techniques with regard to postoperative continence.The preservation of the muscular urethral sphincter is of particular importance. Nevertheless, the preservation of further anatomical structures contributes to postoperative continence. Preservation of bladder neck, nerve sparing, and reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction are operative techniques to prevent postoperative incontinence. In the last decade different modifications of the operative technique have been investigated regarding specific effects on postoperative continence. The interpretation of these studies investigating these operative techniques showed improvement in early continence with shorter period of time to continence. Long-term follow-up revealed no significant advantages for these modifications with regard to continence compared to the standard procedure. To evaluate the long-term effects of certain modifications to prevent incontinence, randomized and well powered studies are necessary. It seems to be most likely that a combination of these preventive modifications will lead to improved postoperative continence rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1291-4 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1336-40 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):926-8 - PubMed
    1. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Dec;3(6):465-70 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1018-23 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources