Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids
- PMID: 2037676
- PMCID: PMC269824
- DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.592-594.1991
Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids
Abstract
To help prevent pyrogenic reactions and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the Centers for Disease Control recommend microbiologic assay of hemodialysis fluids at least monthly. Five commercially available assay systems were evaluated by using the membrane filtration technique with standard methods agar and trypticase soy agar as the standards for comparison. Each assay system was challenged with dialysate and reverse-osmosis water from local dialysis centers, aqueous suspensions of eight laboratory strains of gram-negative bacilli and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and a mixed microbial flora inoculated into reverse-osmosis water and laboratory-prepared dialysate. Mean viable counts from triplicate samples were obtained after incubation at 37 degrees C for up to 72 h. The efficiency of recovery varied with the specific type of microbial challenge. The SPC water sampler (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) was the most consistent in obtaining the highest viable counts. Other commercial systems were comparable to each other in overall performance. All assay systems tested provided an acceptable balance between microbial recovery and required sampling time, equipment, and expertise.
Similar articles
-
Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids.J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1462-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1462-1465.1991. J Clin Microbiol. 1991. PMID: 1885742 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of different culture methods on bacterial recovery in hemodialysis fluids.J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Nov;87(11):1361-7. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004. PMID: 15825714
-
Pyrogenic reactions in patients receiving conventional, high-efficiency, or high-flux hemodialysis treatments with bicarbonate dialysate containing high concentrations of bacteria and endotoxin.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992 Mar;2(9):1436-44. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V291436. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992. PMID: 1627766
-
Water treatment for hemodialysis--updated to include the latest AAMI standards for dialysate (RD52: 2004) continuing.Nephrol Nurs J. 2005 Mar-Apr;32(2):151-67; quiz 168-70. Nephrol Nurs J. 2005. PMID: 15889801 Review.
-
Microbiological and endotoxin assays of hemodialysis fluids.Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995 Jan;2(1):70-9. doi: 10.1016/s1073-4449(12)80073-2. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995. PMID: 7614339 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids.J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1462-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1462-1465.1991. J Clin Microbiol. 1991. PMID: 1885742 Free PMC article.
-
Hemodialysis and water quality.Semin Dial. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):427-38. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12113. Semin Dial. 2013. PMID: 23859187 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Whole genome sequence data of Mycolicibacterium parafortuitum Panama NTM 1 from a dairy farm in Panama.Data Brief. 2025 Feb 7;59:111368. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111368. eCollection 2025 Apr. Data Brief. 2025. PMID: 40051420 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources