Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Mar;29(3):592-4.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.592-594.1991.

Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids

M J Arduino et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar.

Abstract

To help prevent pyrogenic reactions and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the Centers for Disease Control recommend microbiologic assay of hemodialysis fluids at least monthly. Five commercially available assay systems were evaluated by using the membrane filtration technique with standard methods agar and trypticase soy agar as the standards for comparison. Each assay system was challenged with dialysate and reverse-osmosis water from local dialysis centers, aqueous suspensions of eight laboratory strains of gram-negative bacilli and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and a mixed microbial flora inoculated into reverse-osmosis water and laboratory-prepared dialysate. Mean viable counts from triplicate samples were obtained after incubation at 37 degrees C for up to 72 h. The efficiency of recovery varied with the specific type of microbial challenge. The SPC water sampler (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) was the most consistent in obtaining the highest viable counts. Other commercial systems were comparable to each other in overall performance. All assay systems tested provided an acceptable balance between microbial recovery and required sampling time, equipment, and expertise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ASAIO Trans. 1987 Jul-Sep;33(3):542-5 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1988 Oct 14;260(14):2073-6 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1990 Jan;161(1):85-90 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1975 Oct 18;2(7938):732-4 - PubMed
    1. Health Lab Sci. 1975 Oct;12(4):321-34 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources