Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial
- PMID: 20378636
- PMCID: PMC2851939
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c1642
Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether screening and treating women for chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the subsequent 12 months.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Common rooms, lecture theatres, and student bars at universities and further education colleges in London.
Participants: 2529 sexually active female students, mean age 21 years (range 16-27).
Intervention: Participants completed a questionnaire and provided self taken vaginal swabs, with follow-up after one year. Samples were randomly allocated to immediate testing and treatment for chlamydial infection, or storage and analysis after a year (deferred screening controls).
Main outcome measure: Incidence of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months.
Results: Baseline prevalence of chlamydia was 5.4% (68/1254) in screened women and 5.9% (75/1265) in controls. 94% (2377/2529) of women were followed up after 12 months. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 1.3% (15/1191) in screened women compared with 1.9% (23/1186) in controls (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.22). Seven of 74 control women (9.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.7% to 18.3%) who tested positive for chlamydial infection at baseline developed pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months compared with one of 63 (1.6%) screened women (relative risk 0.17, 0.03 to 1.01). However, most episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline (79%, 30/38). 22% (527/2377) of women reported being tested independently for chlamydia during the trial.
Conclusion: Although some evidence suggests that screening for chlamydia reduces rates of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially in women with chlamydial infection at baseline, the effectiveness of a single chlamydia test in preventing pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months may have been overestimated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115388.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the unified competing interest form at
Comment in
-
Screening for Chlamydia.BMJ. 2010 Apr 8;340:c1698. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1698. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 20378637 No abstract available.
-
Chlamydia infection. Screening needs more answers.BMJ. 2010 May 11;340:c2502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2502. BMJ. 2010. PMID: 20460319 No abstract available.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR 2006;55:56-7.
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Chlamydia control in Europe. ECDC, 2009.
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Revised rapid review of evidence for the effectiveness of screening for genital chlamydia infection in sexually active young women and men. NICE, 2006.
-
- Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich F, Andrilla H, Holmes K, Stamm W. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydia infection. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1362-6. - PubMed
-
- Abter E, Mahmud M. Screening for chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1531. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical