Demographic and health characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in a work site health-promotion program
- PMID: 2037902
Demographic and health characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in a work site health-promotion program
Abstract
Work site health-promotion programs represent an increasingly common attempt by industry to improve the health of employees. The potential impact of programs is limited by nonparticipation, especially among demographic subgroups and those who could most benefit from health behavior change. The present study prospectively examined the relationship of personnel data and self-reported health habits and health status to participation in the health-promotion program at a research and development work site. Thirty-four percent of the 505 employees enrolled in the health-promotion program. White employees were 2.47 times as likely to participate as nonwhites (95% confidence interval, 1.59, 3.83). Those with health maintenance organization health insurance were 1.43 times as likely to participate as were employees with fee-for-service insurance (1.11, 1.84). There was no difference between participants and nonparticipants in self-reported health status, and only slightly more positive health habits were noted among participants. Seatbelt use was 1.65 times more common among participants (1.10, 2.49). The study results are reassuring that such programs do not enroll only the very healthy or those with healthy habits. However, the diminished enrollment of nonwhite employees supports concern that health-related programs may not equally reach all segments of the work force.
Similar articles
-
Psychosocial predictors of participation in a work site health-promotion program.J Occup Med. 1991 Apr;33(4):479-85. J Occup Med. 1991. PMID: 2037903
-
Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs.J Occup Environ Med. 1996 May;38(5):535-8. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199605000-00015. J Occup Environ Med. 1996. PMID: 8733646
-
Know your numbers: comparing participants and nonparticipants in a university health screening program.J Am Coll Health. 1997 Sep;46(2):87-91. doi: 10.1080/07448489709595592. J Am Coll Health. 1997. PMID: 9276352
-
Work site health promotion research: to what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?Health Educ Behav. 2003 Oct;30(5):537-49. doi: 10.1177/1090198103254340. Health Educ Behav. 2003. PMID: 14582596 Review.
-
Factors associated with, issues related to, and suggestions for increasing participation in workplace health promotion programs.Health Values. 1990 Jul-Aug;14(4):29-36. Health Values. 1990. PMID: 10107078 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of workforce characteristics and monetary incentives on uptake of health and wellbeing initiatives in the United Kingdom.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;5(3):e0003984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003984. eCollection 2025. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40096071 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources