Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;42(3):867-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.015.

Risky car following in abstinent users of MDMA

Affiliations

Risky car following in abstinent users of MDMA

Elizabeth Dastrup et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 May.

Abstract

Ecstasy (MDMA) use raises concerns because of its association with risky driving. We evaluated driving performance and risk taking in abstinent recreational MDMA users in a simulated car following task that required continuous attention and vigilance. Drivers were asked to follow two car lengths behind a lead vehicle (LV). Three sinusoids generated unpredictable LV velocity changes. Drivers could mitigate risk by following further behind the erratic LV. From vehicle trajectory data we performed a Fourier analysis to derive measures of coherence, gain, and delay. These measures and headway distance were compared between the different groups. All MDMA drivers met coherence criteria indicating cooperation in the car following task. They matched periodic changes in LV velocity similar to controls (abstinent THC users, abstinent alcohol users, and non-drug users), militating against worse vigilance. While all participants traveled approximately 55 mph (89 kph), the MDMA drivers followed 64 m closer to the LV and demonstrated 1.04 s shorter delays to LV velocity changes than other driver groups. The simulated car following task safely discriminated between driving behavior in abstinent MDMA users and controls. Abstinent MDMA users do not perform worse than controls, but may assume extra risk. The control theory framework used in this study revealed behaviors that might not otherwise be evident.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Static frame from the simulator depicts the view available to the driver at a distance of approximately 18 meters behind the LV for the car following task.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LV’s velocity pattern
Figure 3
Figure 3
Demonstration of delay in subjects with a high coherence.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustration of the periodogram for the LV velocity. Three peaks in the spectral density exist, representing the main periodicities of the LV velocity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen GJ, Ni R. The spatial extent of attention during driving. 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; 2005.
    1. Bechara A. Risky business: emotion, decision-making and addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2003;19:23–51. - PubMed
    1. Bechara A. Decision-making, impulse control, and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8(11):1458–1463. - PubMed
    1. Bolla K, et al. Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA ("ecstasy") users [see comments] Neurology. 1998;51:1532–1537. - PubMed
    1. Brookhuis K, et al. Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic. Ergonomics. 1994;37(3):427–434.

Publication types

MeSH terms