Accuracy of noninvasively determined pulmonary artery systolic pressure
- PMID: 20381676
- PMCID: PMC2994808
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.048
Accuracy of noninvasively determined pulmonary artery systolic pressure
Erratum in
- Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 1;106(7):1060
Abstract
The noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) has become a standard component of the echocardiographic examination. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of this modality in a large series of unselected studies obtained in clinical practice. All right heart catheterizations during a 4-year period were reviewed. Studies with echocardiographic findings available within 48 hours were evaluated for PASP agreement. In an effort to mirror clinical practice, the right heart catheterization findings were used as the reference standard and the PASP values were taken directly from the respective clinical reports. Overall, 792 right heart catheterization-echocardiogram pairs were identified. Echocardiographic PASP could not be estimated in 174 of these studies (22.0%). The correlation between modalities was moderate, but agreement was poor (bias 9.0%, 95% limits of agreement -53.2% to 71.2%, r = 0.52, p <0.001). Misclassification of clinical PASP categories occurred more often than not (54.4%). Multivariate analysis using multiple potential sources of error could only account for 3.2% of the total variation in the discrepancy between the study modalities (p = 0.003). In conclusion, noninvasively estimated PASP had limited agreement with the invasively determined PASP, and misclassification of PASP clinical categories occurred frequently. Given the widespread use of echocardiographically determined PASP, these data are in need of replication in a large prospective study.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.
Figures
Comment in
-
Lack of correlation between Doppler and catheter in pulmonary pressure: flawed noninvasive technique or straw man.Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 1;106(7):1059-60; author reply 1060. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.006. Am J Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20854976 No abstract available.
References
-
- McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, Mathier MA, McGoon MD, Park MH, Rosenson RS, Rubin LJ, Tapson VF, Varga J American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents, American Heart Association, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society I, Pulmonary Hypertension Association. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573–1619. - PubMed
-
- Feigenbaum H, Armstrong WF, Ryan T, Feigenbaum H. Feigenbaum’s echocardiography. 6. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. pp. 214–246.
-
- Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:493–496. - PubMed
-
- Currie PJ, Seward JB, Chan KL, Fyfe DA, Hagler DJ, Mair DD, Reeder GS, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ. Continuous wave Doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:750–756. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
