Outcome of patients with localized prostate cancer treated by radiotherapy after confirming the absence of lymph node invasion
- PMID: 20382633
- PMCID: PMC2893779
- DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq032
Outcome of patients with localized prostate cancer treated by radiotherapy after confirming the absence of lymph node invasion
Abstract
Objective: Management of lymph nodes in radiotherapy for prostate cancer is an issue for curative intent. To find the influence of lymph nodes, patients with T1-T3 prostate cancer and surgically confirmed negative nodes were treated with radiotherapy.
Methods: After lymphadenectomy, 118 patients received photon beam radiotherapy with 66 Gy to the prostate. No adjuvant treatment was performed until biochemical failure. After failure, hormone therapy was administered. Follow-up period was 57 months (mean).
Results: Biochemical failure occurred in 47 patients. Few failures were observed in patients with low (24%) and intermediate risks (14%). In contrast, 64% of high-risk patients experienced failure, 97% of whom showed until 36 months. Most patients with failure responded well to hormone therapy. After 15 months (mean), a second biochemical failure occurred in 21% of patients who had the first failure, most of them were high risk. Factors involving failure were high initial and nadir prostate-specific antigen, advanced stage, short prostate-specific antigen-doubling time and duration between radiation and first failure. Failure showed an insufficient reduction in prostate-specific antigen after radiotherapy. Factor for second failure was prostate-specific antigen-doubling time at first failure.
Conclusions: Half of high-risk patients experienced biochemical failure, indicating one of the causes involves factors other than lymph nodes. Low-, intermediate- and the other half of high-risk patients did not need to take immediate hormone therapy after radiotherapy. After failure, delayed hormone therapy was effective. Prostate-specific antigen parameters were predictive factors for further outcome.
Figures
References
-
- Hanks GE, Krall JM, Hanlon AL, Asbell SO, Pilepich MV, Owen JB. Patterns of care and RTOG studies in prostate cancer: Long term survival, Hazard rate observations, and possibilities of cure. Int J Radiat Oncology Biol Phys. 1993;28:39–45. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90139-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Roach M, III, Marquez C, You H-S, Narayan P, Coleman L, Nseyo UO, et al. Predicting the risk of lymph node involvement using the pre-treatment prostate specific antigen and Gleason score in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncology Biol Phys. 1993;28:33–7. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90138-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology. 2001;58:843–8. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01441-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nguyen PL, Chen M-H, Hoffman KE, Katz MS, D'Amico AV. Predicting the risk of pelvic node involvement among men with prostate cancer in the contemporary era. Int J Radiat Oncology Biol Phys. 2009;74:104–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.053. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bhojani N, Ahyal S, Graefen M, Capitanio U, Suardi N, Shariat SF, et al. Partin tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:123–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.013. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
