Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
- PMID: 20382983
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909305
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
Abstract
Background: Few data are available on the long-term outcome of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm as compared with open repair.
Methods: From 1999 through 2004 at 37 hospitals in the United Kingdom, we randomly assigned 1252 patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms (> or = 5.5 cm in diameter) to undergo either endovascular or open repair; 626 patients were assigned to each group. Patients were followed for rates of death, graft-related complications, reinterventions, and resource use until the end of 2009. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to compare outcomes in the two groups.
Results: The 30-day operative mortality was 1.8% in the endovascular-repair group and 4.3% in the open-repair group (adjusted odds ratio for endovascular repair as compared with open repair, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.87; P=0.02). The endovascular-repair group had an early benefit with respect to aneurysm-related mortality, but the benefit was lost by the end of the study, at least partially because of fatal endograft ruptures (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.49; P=0.73). By the end of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of death from any cause (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.23; P=0.72). The rates of graft-related complications and reinterventions were higher with endovascular repair, and new complications occurred up to 8 years after randomization, contributing to higher overall costs.
Conclusions: In this large, randomized trial, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm was associated with a significantly lower operative mortality than open surgical repair. However, no differences were seen in total mortality or aneurysm-related mortality in the long term. Endovascular repair was associated with increased rates of graft-related complications and reinterventions and was more costly. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN55703451.)
2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Endovascular aneurysm repair--is it durable?N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1930-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1004299. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20484400 No abstract available.
-
Surgery: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm--the importance of long-term follow-up data.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010 Aug;7(8):415. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.88. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20681047 No abstract available.
-
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1479; author reply 1481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1007807. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20925553 No abstract available.
-
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1480; author reply 1481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1007807. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20931681 No abstract available.
-
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1479-80; author reply 1481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1007807. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20931721 No abstract available.
-
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1480-1; author reply 1481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1007807. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20931722 No abstract available.
-
Is the dream of EVAR over?N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):2041-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1211163. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 23171101 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical