Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Dec;124(3):755-64.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0881-4. Epub 2010 Apr 10.

BRCA1/2 test results impact risk management attitudes, intentions, and uptake

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

BRCA1/2 test results impact risk management attitudes, intentions, and uptake

Suzanne C O'Neill et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Women who receive positive or uninformative BRCA1/2 test results face a number of decisions about how to manage their cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the effect of receiving a positive versus uninformative BRCA1/2 genetic test result on the perceived pros and cons of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO) and breast cancer screening. We further examined how perceived pros and cons of surgery predict intention for and uptake of surgery. 308 women (146 positive, 162 uninformative) were included in RRM and breast cancer screening analyses. 276 women were included in RRO analyses. Participants completed questionnaires at pre-disclosure baseline and 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-disclosure. We used linear multiple regression to assess whether test result contributed to change in pros and cons and logistic regression to predict intentions and surgery uptake. Receipt of a positive BRCA1/2 test result predicted stronger pros for RRM and RRO (P < 0.001), but not perceived cons of RRM and RRO. Pros of surgery predicted RRM and RRO intentions in carriers and RRO intentions in uninformatives. Cons predicted RRM intentions in carriers. Pros and cons predicted carriers' RRO uptake in the year after testing (P < 0.001). Receipt of BRCA1/2 mutation test results impacts how carriers see the positive aspects of RRO and RRM and their surgical intentions. Both the positive and negative aspects predict uptake of surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Change in Pros and Cons of RRM in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women with uninformative results.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Change in Pros and Cons of RRO in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women with uninformative results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–1333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1310–136. - PubMed
    1. Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, et al. Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2328–2335. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. v.1.2009. [Accessed 27 January 2010]. 2009. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/genetics_screening.pdf.
    1. Smith KL, Robson ME. Update on hereditary breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2006;8:14–21. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms