Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study
- PMID: 2038422
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071409
Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study
Abstract
We compared the diagnostic sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evoked potential (EP) studies in a series of 19 children affected by clinically definite (16 cases) and laboratory supported (3 cases) multiple sclerosis (MS). MRI revealed abnormal areas consistent with demyelinating plaques in 18 out of 19 cases: multiple lesions in 16 and an isolated lesion in 2 cases. Abnormal areas were more frequently found in supratentorial regions than in other areas of the central nervous system. In all patients, the distribution, form and topography of the lesions were typical of MS and similar to those found in the adult form of the disease. Multimodal EP were abnormal in 16 out of 19 cases. Visual (VEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) abnormalities were frequently asymptomatic and VEPs were particularly sensitive in ascertaining childhood MS. MRI was slightly more sensitive than multimodal EP in confirming the clinical diagnosis of childhood MS. However, in suspected or probable MS with normal MRI, VEPs and SEPs may contribute to the definition of clinical diagnosis because of their capacity to demonstrate asymptomatic involvement in central nervous system (CNS) the optic nerve and central somatosensory pathways).
Similar articles
-
[The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].Nervenarzt. 1993 Apr;64(4):226-32. Nervenarzt. 1993. PMID: 8506010 German.
-
Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?Neurol India. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):537-41. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.68669. Neurol India. 2010. PMID: 20739788
-
Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.Ann Neurol. 1986 Nov;20(5):645-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.410200518. Ann Neurol. 1986. PMID: 3789682
-
[Comparative study of magnetic resonance and evoked potentials in patients with clinically defined multiple sclerosis].Neurologia. 1991 Nov;6(9):322-7. Neurologia. 1991. PMID: 1809338 Review. Spanish.
-
[Evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: progress or stagnation?].Przegl Lek. 2010;67(9):729-31. Przegl Lek. 2010. PMID: 21387814 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Brain stem evoked potentials in childhood neurological diseases.Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Sep-Oct;64(5):639-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02726117. Indian J Pediatr. 1997. PMID: 10771897 Review.
-
Multiple sclerosis in childhood and adolescence: clinical features and management.Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(5):329-36. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103050-00002. Paediatr Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11393326 Review.
-
Multiple sclerosis in childhood.Indian J Pediatr. 1994 May-Jun;61(3):297-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02752229. Indian J Pediatr. 1994. PMID: 7960006 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical