Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May;36(5):630-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01517.x. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

A comparative study of pulsed 532-nm potassium titanyl phosphate laser and electrocoagulation in the treatment of spider nevi

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparative study of pulsed 532-nm potassium titanyl phosphate laser and electrocoagulation in the treatment of spider nevi

Angelina Erceg et al. Dermatol Surg. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser treatment and electrocoagulation (EC) for the treatment of spider nevi (SN).

Method: A randomized single-blind intrapatient comparison study was performed. A blinded observer and patients reported the clinical treatment outcome and pain on a visual analogue scale (0-10). Side effects were noted if present.

Results: Mean physician-rated clinical efficacy scores+/-standard error of the mean were 7.7+/-0.7 for KTP laser and 6.2+/-0.9 for EC treatment (p=.05). Patient-rated mean clinical efficacy of KTP laser was 8.3+/-0.6 and of EC was 7.3+/-0.7 (p=.09). Stratification for potential confounding bias, such as location of SN, central bulging vein, and diameter (p=.25) of the treated SN did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the treatments. Treatment with KTP or EC did not result in scarring or pigmentary changes. Pain was reported for KTP treatment (3.1+/-0.4) and EC (6.4+/-0.7) (p<.05).

Conclusion: Clinical efficacy of KTP laser and EC for SN is comparable, although there is a tendency toward an advantage in favor of the KTP laser. KTP laser treatment was less painful.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms