Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies
- PMID: 20386058
- PMCID: PMC2924625
- DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq011
Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies
Erratum in
- J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):223
- J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2011;2011(43):152
Abstract
Background: Screening has become one of our best tools for early detection and prevention of cancer. The group-randomized trial is the most rigorous experimental design for evaluating multilevel interventions. However, identifying the proper sample size for a group-randomized trial requires reliable estimates of intraclass correlation (ICC) for screening outcomes, which are not available to researchers. We present crude and adjusted ICC estimates for cancer screening outcomes for various levels of aggregation (physician, clinic, and county) and provide an example of how these ICC estimates may be used in the design of a future trial.
Methods: Investigators working in the area of cancer screening were contacted and asked to provide crude and adjusted ICC estimates using the analysis of variance method estimator.
Results: Of the 29 investigators identified, estimates were obtained from 10 investigators who had relevant data. ICC estimates were calculated from 13 different studies, with more than half of the studies collecting information on colorectal screening. In the majority of cases, ICC estimates could be adjusted for age, education, and other demographic characteristics, leading to a reduction in the ICC. ICC estimates varied considerably by cancer site and level of aggregation of the groups.
Conclusions: Previously, only two articles had published ICCs for cancer screening outcomes. We have complied more than 130 crude and adjusted ICC estimates covering breast, cervical, colon, and prostate screening and have detailed them by level of aggregation, screening measure, and study characteristics. We have also demonstrated their use in planning a future trial and the need for the evaluation of the proposed interval estimator for binary outcomes under conditions typically seen in GRTs.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):58-71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq009. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20386054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Awareness and uptake of colorectal, breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening tests in Spain.Eur J Public Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):264-70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt089. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Eur J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 23813710
-
Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):869-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22627076 Free PMC article.
-
Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):38-57. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq008. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20386053 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.Prev Med. 2014 Jan;58:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24212061 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Maximin optimal designs for cluster randomized trials.Biometrics. 2017 Sep;73(3):916-926. doi: 10.1111/biom.12659. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Biometrics. 2017. PMID: 28182835 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective evaluation of sedation-related adverse events in pediatric patients ventilated for acute respiratory failure.Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1317-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823c8ae3. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22425823 Free PMC article.
-
Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 9;24(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37946132 Free PMC article.
-
Malaria prevalence metrics in low- and middle-income countries: an assessment of precision in nationally-representative surveys.Malar J. 2017 Nov 21;16(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2127-y. Malar J. 2017. PMID: 29162099 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cuzick J. Screening for cancer: future potential. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(5):685–692. - PubMed
-
- Meissner HI, Smith RA, Rimer BK, et al. Promoting cancer screening: learning from experience. Cancer. 2004;101(suppl 5):1107–1117. - PubMed
-
- Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer. 2004;101(suppl 5):1146–1164. - PubMed
-
- Paskett ED, McLaughlin JM, Reiter PL, et al. Psychosocial predictors of adherence to risk-appropriate cervical cancer screening guidelines: a cross sectional study of women in Ohio Appalachia participating in the Community Awareness Resources and Education (CARE) project. Prev Med. 2010;50(1–2):74–80. - PMC - PubMed