Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;17(4):600-16.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9225-3. Epub 2010 Apr 13.

Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program

Affiliations

Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program

Ran Klein et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Changes in myocardial blood flow between rest and stress states are commonly used to diagnose coronary artery disease. Relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is used routinely while myocardial blood flow quantification (MBF) may improve the sensitivity for detection of early disease. The ratio of flow at stress and rest (S/R) and their difference (S-R) have both been proposed as a means to detect regions with reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR). In this study, we describe a highly automated method to calculate regional and global rest, stress, S/R, and S-R polar maps of the left ventricle myocardium.

Methods: We measured the inter- and intra-operator variability using two randomized datasets (n = 30 each) for each of two operators (novice and expert) with correlation and Bland-Altman reproducibility coefficient (RPC%) analyses.

Results: S-R MBF had less inter-operator dependent variability than S/R (RPC% = 5.0% vs 12.6%, P < .001). While there was no difference in intra-operator variability with S-R MBF (novice vs expert RPC% = 6.4% vs 5.9%, P = ns), variability was higher in the novice-operator for S/R (RPC% = 16.8% vs 8.5% respectively, P < .001), suggesting that S-R may be preferred for detecting small changes in MFR. The novice operator's intervention pattern became more similar to that of the expert in the later dataset, emphasizing the need for adequate training and quality assurance.

Conclusion: The proposed method results in low operator-dependent variability, suitable for routine use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circ Res. 1985 Sep;57(3):341-53 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):146-54 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;50(1):68-71 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Aug;34(8):1178-88 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):1029-39 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances