Clinical efficacy of highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 20389096
- DOI: 10.1159/000308458
Clinical efficacy of highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background/aims: To compare the effectiveness of highly purified hMG (Menopur) with recombinant FSH (Gonal-F) in IVF/ICSI patients who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with pituitary suppression.
Methods: A literature search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Medline and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed using the key words 'highly purified hMG' and 'recombinant FSH.' Only prospective randomized controlled trials were included when they compared IVF/ICSI outcomes after administration of Menopur versus Gonal-F. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy/live birth.
Results: Ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96-1.26) or per embryo transfer (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99-1.29), as well as live birth rate per embryo transfer (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33), is similar between the Menopur and the Gonal-F group.
Conclusion: The combined data presented in this meta-analysis do not support a clinical superiority of Gonal-F over Menopur.
Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin vs. recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in first-cycle in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.Fertil Steril. 2008 Jun;89(6):1685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.039. Epub 2007 Aug 6. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17681325 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing their first treatment cycle of IVF or ICSI.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1053-60. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499450. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010. PMID: 20602599
-
Effectiveness of human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles: a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2003 Nov;80(5):1086-93. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)02187-3. Fertil Steril. 2003. PMID: 14607553
-
Highly purified hMG achieves better pregnancy rates in IVF cycles but not ICSI cycles compared with recombinant FSH: a meta-analysis.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009 Jun;25(6):372-8. doi: 10.1080/09513590802630120. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009. PMID: 19340668
-
Identifying real differences in live birth rates between HMG and rFSH in IVF.Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18 Suppl 2:25-30. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60445-2. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009. PMID: 19406028 Review.
Cited by
-
Gonadotropin therapy in assisted reproduction: an evolutionary perspective from biologics to biotech.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(4):279-93. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(04)10. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014. PMID: 24714837 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 15;13:931756. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.931756. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36046790 Free PMC article.
-
Economic evaluation of alternative assisted reproduction techniques in management of infertility in Greece.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:185-92. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S31972. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012. PMID: 22888264 Free PMC article.
-
Consecutive versus concomitant follicle-stimulating hormone and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin: A milder response but better quality.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022 Jun;49(2):135-141. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2021.05155. Epub 2022 May 30. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022. PMID: 35698776 Free PMC article.
-
Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.J Endocrinol Invest. 2015 May;38(5):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0204-4. Epub 2014 Dec 6. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015. PMID: 25480425 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous