Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Jun 15;111(6):739-42.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76782-0.

The effect of allograft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty on central endothelial cell density

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The effect of allograft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty on central endothelial cell density

D C Musch et al. Am J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

We identified all patients who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus and were being observed longitudinally (N = 174). During the follow-up period, 57 of 174 patients (33%) showed evidence of an allograft rejection episode, which occurred at an average of eight months after the operation. We analyzed specular photographs of the corneal endothelium, taken before and after the first allograft rejection episode. A significant decrease in endothelial cell density was observed (11.8%, P less than .0001). As a control, we analyzed all available specular photographs from patients with keratoconus who showed no evidence of allograft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty. The observed endothelial cell density decrease (11.8%) in patients with keratoconus undergoing allograft rejection exceeded that found in the control subjects (6.8%) during a comparable time period (P = .06). Severe allograft rejection episodes resulted in a decrease in endothelial cell density that exceeded expected loss significantly (14.8% compared with 6.9%, P = .01), whereas mild allograft rejection episodes were not associated with a loss in endothelial cell density exceeding that expected (1.8% compared with 6.5%, P = .34).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources