Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices
- PMID: 2039059
- DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900202
Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of different ankle support devices on athletic performance. Thirty varsity college athletes were tested with both ankles supported by taping, Swede-O brace, Kallassy brace or left unsupported. The athletes performed four events: broad jump, vertical leap, 10 yard shuttle run, and 40 yard sprint. The events and appliances were randomized to prevent bias by fatigue. Compared to the results when no support was used, ankle taping resulted in a significant decreased performance in the vertical jump (4%), shuttle run (1.6%), and sprint (3.5%) (P less than 0.05). Use of the Swede-O brace decreased performance in the vertical jump (4.6%), broad jump (3.6%), and time of the sprint (3.2%). Results using the Kallassy brace showed a decrease in the vertical jump (3.4%) when compared to no support. The test results of the shuttle run with taping were slower than the Kallassy brace (P less than 0.05). Wearing the Swede-O brace caused the athletes' broad jump distance to decrease more than the Kallassy brace (P less than 0.05). Subjective questionnaires supported the Kallassy brace as the most comfortable support and the one that decreased performance the least. Taping of the ankles is universally accepted for ankle prophylaxis. This study has shown a decrease in performance when ankles are taped compared to ankles with no protection. Since the decreases in performance caused by ankle braces are minor, this should not be used as a criterion for selection of prophylactic support compared to taping.
Similar articles
-
The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing vs. adhesive ankle taping on motor performance.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 May;23(5):320-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1996.23.5.320. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996. PMID: 8728530 Clinical Trial.
-
Prophylactic bracing versus taping for the prevention of ankle sprains in high school athletes: a prospective, randomized trial.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;45(6):360-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.09.005. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006. PMID: 17145460 Clinical Trial.
-
Prophylactic ankle bracing vs. taping: effects on functional performance in female basketball players.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Aug;22(2):77-81. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.2.77. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995. PMID: 7581435
-
The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.Sports Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):171-8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199927030-00003. Sports Med. 1999. PMID: 10222540 Review.
-
Prophylactic ankle bracing.Pediatr Clin North Am. 1990 Oct;37(5):1175-85. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36982-6. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2120671 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.Sports Med. 1998 May;25(5):285-312. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199825050-00001. Sports Med. 1998. PMID: 9629608 Review.
-
Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4):436-445. J Athl Train. 2002. PMID: 12937565 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors of Ankle Sprain in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;13(4):105. doi: 10.3390/sports13040105. Sports (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40278731 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ankle injuries and ankle strength, flexibility, and proprioception in college basketball players.J Athl Train. 1997 Jul;32(3):221-5. J Athl Train. 1997. PMID: 16558453 Free PMC article.
-
Stabilizing effects of ankle bracing under a combination of inversion and axial compression loading.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Apr;14(4):373-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0652-7. Epub 2005 Jun 15. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006. PMID: 15959767
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical