Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Mar;35(3):548-52.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.3.548.

Effects of roxithromycin on fecal bacteria in human volunteers and resistance to colonization in gnotobiotic mice

Affiliations

Effects of roxithromycin on fecal bacteria in human volunteers and resistance to colonization in gnotobiotic mice

S Pecquet et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar.

Abstract

The ecological impact of roxithromycin given orally at 300 mg/day on the intestinal floras in six human volunteers was studied. The resulting fecal concentrations of active roxithromycin were in the range of 100 to 200 micrograms/g of feces. Consecutive modifications in the composition of the fecal floras were limited to a decrease in counts of total members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The rest of the intestinal floras, including the predominant anaerobic floras, changed little. No overgrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, staphylococci, fungi, or highly erythromycin-resistant strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae was observed. The strains of Enterobacteriaceae and of anaerobes isolated during treatment were not markedly more resistant to roxithromycin than those isolated before treatment started. Changes in intestinal resistance to colonization by exogenous microorganisms in gnotobiotic mice inoculated with human fecal flora were studied and were also found to be minimal. The impact of oral roxithromycin on the intestinal microbiota appears to be weaker than that previously observed with oral erythromycin, perhaps because the concentrations of roxithromycin in the feces were lower than those previously found for erythromycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Apr;17(4):568-76 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1970 Dec;23(12):1608-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1981 Nov-Dec;132 B(3):419-27 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1983 Sep;148(3):579-87 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1985 Sep;49(3):751-5 - PubMed

Publication types