Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals
- PMID: 20392324
- DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310000048
Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to get insight in what criteria as presented in Health technology assessment (HTA) studies are important for decision makers in healthcare priority setting.
Methods: We performed a discrete choice experiment among Dutch healthcare professionals (policy makers, HTA experts, advanced HTA students). In twenty-seven choice sets, we asked respondents to elect reimbursement of one of two different healthcare interventions, which represented unlabeled, curative treatments. Both treatments were incrementally compared with usual care. The results of the interventions were normal outputs of HTA studies with a societal perspective. Results were analyzed using a multinomial logistic regression model. Upon completion of the questionnaire, we discussed the exercise with policy makers.
Results: Severity of disease, costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained, individual health gain, and the budget impact were the most decisive decision criteria. A program targeting more severe diseases increased the probability of reimbursement dramatically. Uncertainty related to cost-effectiveness was also important. Respondents preferred health gains that include quality of life improvements over extension of life without improved quality of life. Savings in productivity costs were not crucial in decision making, although these are to be included in Dutch reimbursement dossiers for new drugs. Regarding subgroups, we found that policy makers attached relatively more weight to disease severity than others but less to uncertainty.
Conclusions: Dutch policy makers and other healthcare professionals seem to have reasonably well articulated preferences: six of seven attributes were significant. Disease severity, budget impact, and cost-effectiveness were very important. The results are comparable to international studies, but reveal a larger set of important decision criteria.
Similar articles
-
Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.001. Value Health. 2012. PMID: 22583464
-
Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Winter;24(1):60-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307080087. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008. PMID: 18218170
-
Finding legitimacy for the role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):49-55. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090072. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19126251
-
Using threshold values for cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained in healthcare decisions.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):71-6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310001194. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011. PMID: 21262069 Review.
-
Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care.Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 14. Health Policy. 2010. PMID: 20466449 Review.
Cited by
-
Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 May 26;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0110-7. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 27230485 Free PMC article.
-
Transforming EQ-5D utilities for use in cost–value analysis of health programs.Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Apr;16(3):313-28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0576-6. Eur J Health Econ. 2015. PMID: 24659019
-
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31318926 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the job preferences of senior medical students for mandatory service: a discrete choice experiment.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 May 31;25:e31. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000252. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024. PMID: 38818776 Free PMC article.
-
What Can We Expect from Value-Based Funding of Medicines? A Retrospective Study.Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0354-z. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016. PMID: 26610347
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources