Pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression
- PMID: 20392461
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.043
Pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression
Abstract
Objective: This article illustrates our operative technique for pharyngostomy tube placement and describes our clinical experience with pharyngostomy use for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy from January 2008 to August 2009. Patients were included if they had a pharyngostomy tube placed at esophagectomy (prophylactic placement) or as a means of decompression after postesophagectomy anastomotic leak (therapeutic placement). We collected operative and clinical data and performed a descriptive statistical analysis.
Results: We placed 25 pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy. Eleven were placed prophylactically (44%); the remaining 14 were placed therapeutically (56%) after anastomotic leak. Prophylactic pharyngostomy tubes remained in place a median of 8 days (range 4-17 days), whereas therapeutic pharyngostomy tubes were left in place a median of 15 days (range 7-125 days). There were 4 infectious complications (16%) unrelated to length of pharyngostomy use: 2 cases of cellulitis (resolved with antibiotics, tube remaining in place) and 2 superficial abscesses after tube removal requiring bedside débridement. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent swallow evaluation; 22% of these patients had radiographic evidence of aspiration.
Conclusions: Pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy is simple, and tubes can stay in place for prolonged periods. Our experience suggests that pharyngostomy tubes are a safe alternative to nasogastric drainage.
Copyright 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Pharyngostomy Tube: Indications, Technique, Efficacy, and Safety in Modern Surgical Practice.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(5):390-395. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593878. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 27855471
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression.Am Surg. 2009 Oct;75(10):929-31. Am Surg. 2009. PMID: 19886137
-
Retrograde jejunogastric decompression after esophagectomy is superior to nasogastric drainage.Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):499-503. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.082. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21704297
-
Esophageal conduit necrosis.Thorac Surg Clin. 2006 Feb;16(1):11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.003. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006. PMID: 16696279 Review.
-
Complications of pharyngostomy.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Aug;29(4):237-40. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(91)90190-g. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991. PMID: 1911671 Review.
Cited by
-
Giant paraesophageal hernia: What do we really know?JTCVS Tech. 2020 Aug 13;3:367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.021. eCollection 2020 Sep. JTCVS Tech. 2020. PMID: 34317934 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical