Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces
- PMID: 20392968
- PMCID: PMC3831352
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546510361494
Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency alters 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics, yet only anterior translation and internal rotation have been the primary measures in previous studies.
Purpose: To compare the 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics and the graft forces after single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions under various external loading conditions.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees were tested with a robotic testing system under 4 conditions: intact, ACL deficient, single-bundle reconstructed with a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft, and double-bundle reconstructed with 2 looped hamstring tendon grafts. Knee kinematics and forces of the ACL or ACL graft in each knee were measured under 3 loading conditions: an anterior tibial load of 134 N, a simulated quadriceps muscle load of 400 N, and combined tibial torques (10 N.m valgus and 5 N.m internal tibial torques) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion.
Results: The double-bundle reconstruction restored the anterior and medial laxities closer to the intact knee than the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the internal rotation of the tibia under the simulated quadriceps muscle load was significantly decreased when compared with the intact knee after both reconstructions, more so after double-bundle reconstruction (P < .05). The entire graft force of the double-bundle reconstruction was more similar to that of the intact ACL than that of the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the posterolateral bundle graft in the double-bundle reconstructed knee was overloaded as compared with the intact posterolateral bundle.
Conclusion: The double-bundle reconstruction can better restore the normal anterior-posterior and medial-lateral laxities than the single-bundle reconstruction can, but an overloading of the posterolateral bundle graft can occur in a double-bundle reconstructed knee.
Clinical relevance: Both single-bundle and double-bundle techniques cannot restore the rotational laxities and the ACL force distributions of the intact knee.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft: can it restore normal knee joint kinematics?Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):713-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546509353406. Epub 2010 Feb 5. Am J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20139332 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):107-18. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01215. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19122085
-
Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):962-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508330145. Epub 2009 Mar 4. Am J Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19261901 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):849-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.12.003. Arthroscopy. 2011. PMID: 21624681 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anatomic Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction.Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Mar;18(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181bf6634. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010. PMID: 20160627 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 2;9(7):23259671211024591. doi: 10.1177/23259671211024591. eCollection 2021 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34277881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament biomechanics during robotic and mechanical simulations of physiologic and clinical motion tasks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jan;30(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 20. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015. PMID: 25547070 Free PMC article.
-
A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Dec;19 Suppl 1:S4-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1475-3. Epub 2011 Mar 16. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21409463
-
Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using the quadriceps tendon.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):687-95. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3462-y. Epub 2014 Dec 2. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. PMID: 25448139
-
Anteromedial Portal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Yields Similar Outcomes to Non-AMP Femoral Drilling Double-Bundle Techniques: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec 11;7(12):2325967119888140. doi: 10.1177/2325967119888140. eCollection 2019 Dec. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31853457 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:39–44. - PubMed
-
- Diermann N, Schumacher T, Schanz S, Raschke MJ, Petersen W, Zantop T. Rotational instability of the knee: internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(3):353–358. - PubMed
-
- Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, Okeke N, Irrgang JJ. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1263–1274. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
