Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;38(7):1359-67.
doi: 10.1177/0363546510361494. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces

Jong Keun Seon et al. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency alters 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics, yet only anterior translation and internal rotation have been the primary measures in previous studies.

Purpose: To compare the 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics and the graft forces after single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions under various external loading conditions.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees were tested with a robotic testing system under 4 conditions: intact, ACL deficient, single-bundle reconstructed with a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft, and double-bundle reconstructed with 2 looped hamstring tendon grafts. Knee kinematics and forces of the ACL or ACL graft in each knee were measured under 3 loading conditions: an anterior tibial load of 134 N, a simulated quadriceps muscle load of 400 N, and combined tibial torques (10 N.m valgus and 5 N.m internal tibial torques) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion.

Results: The double-bundle reconstruction restored the anterior and medial laxities closer to the intact knee than the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the internal rotation of the tibia under the simulated quadriceps muscle load was significantly decreased when compared with the intact knee after both reconstructions, more so after double-bundle reconstruction (P < .05). The entire graft force of the double-bundle reconstruction was more similar to that of the intact ACL than that of the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the posterolateral bundle graft in the double-bundle reconstructed knee was overloaded as compared with the intact posterolateral bundle.

Conclusion: The double-bundle reconstruction can better restore the normal anterior-posterior and medial-lateral laxities than the single-bundle reconstruction can, but an overloading of the posterolateral bundle graft can occur in a double-bundle reconstructed knee.

Clinical relevance: Both single-bundle and double-bundle techniques cannot restore the rotational laxities and the ACL force distributions of the intact knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The robotic testing system with a cadaveric knee specimen installed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic drawings of our surgical techniques including tunnel position in single-bundle (A) and double-bundle (B) anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. AM, anteromedial; PL, posterolateral; C-ACL, center of anterior cruciate ligament; C-AM, center of anteromedial bundle; C-PM, center of posterolateral bundle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Anterior translation of the tibia under the anterior tibial load in the 4 conditions. The anterior cruciate ligament–deficient condition shows significant difference from the 3 other conditions at all angles. *P < .05. Error bars represent standard deviation. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; def, deficient; SB, single bundle; DB, double bundle; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Anterior translation of the tibia under the simulated muscle load in the 4 conditions. The anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee was significantly different from the other 3 conditions from 0° to 30°. *P < .05. Error bars represent standard deviation. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; def, deficient; SB, single bundle; DB, double bundle; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Internal rotations of the tibia under the muscle load in the 4 conditions. *P < .05. Error bars represent standard deviation. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; def, deficient; SB, single bundle; DB, double bundle; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:39–44. - PubMed
    1. Brady MF, Bradley MP, Fleming BC, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Banerjee R. Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):395–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diermann N, Schumacher T, Schanz S, Raschke MJ, Petersen W, Zantop T. Rotational instability of the knee: internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(3):353–358. - PubMed
    1. Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, Okeke N, Irrgang JJ. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1263–1274. - PubMed
    1. Gadikota HR, Seon JK, Kozanek M, et al. Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):962–969. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types