The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions
- PMID: 20393104
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09353792
The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions
Abstract
Background: Patient involvement is required before patients' preferences can be reflected in the medical care they receive. Furthermore, patients are a vital link between physicians' assessments of patients' needs and actual implementation of appropriate care. Yet no study has specifically examined how and when a representative sample of patients considered, discussed, and made medical decisions.
Objective: To identify decision prevalence and decision-making processes regarding 1) initiation of prescription medications for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or depression; 2) screening tests for colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer; and 3) surgeries for knee or hip replacement, cataracts, or lower back pain.
Design: Computer-assisted telephone interview survey.
Setting: Nationally representative sample of US adults in households with telephones.
Participants: 3010 English-speaking adults age 40 and older identified using a stratified random sample of telephone numbers.
Measurements: Estimated prevalence of medical decisions, defined as the patient having initiated medications, been screened, or had surgery within the past 2 years or having discussed these actions with a health care provider during the same interval, as well as decision-specific data regarding patient knowledge, attitudes and patient-provider interactions.
Results: 82.2% of the target population reported making at least 1 medical decision in the preceding 2 years. The proportion of decisions resulting in patient action varied dramatically both across decision type (medications [61%] v. screening [83%] v. surgery [44%]; P < 0.001), and within each category (e.g., blood pressure medications [76%] v. cholesterol medications [55%] vs. depression medications [48%]; P < 0.001). Respondents reported making more decisions if they had a primary care provider or poorer health status and fewer decisions if they had lower education, were male, or were under age 50. Limitations. Retrospective self-reports may incorporate recall biases.
Conclusions: Medical decisions with significant life-saving, quality of life, and cost implications are a pervasive part of life for most US adults. The DECISIONS dataset provides a rich research environment for exploring factors influencing when and how patients make common medical decisions.
Similar articles
-
How patient centered are medical decisions?: Results of a national survey.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 8;173(13):1215-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6172. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23712194
-
Race, ethnicity, and shared decision making for hyperlipidemia and hypertension treatment: the DECISIONS survey.Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):65S-76S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10378699. Med Decis Making. 2010. PMID: 20881155
-
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):53S-64S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10378701. Med Decis Making. 2010. PMID: 20881154 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26182303 Free PMC article.
-
Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1708-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0719-5. Epub 2008 Jul 30. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18665428 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20. Eur J Health Econ. 2019. PMID: 31111402 Free PMC article.
-
Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Educ. 2025. PMID: 40285812
-
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10): A patient-reported psychosocial survey for quality cancer care.Psychol Assess. 2016 Sep;28(9):1087-100. doi: 10.1037/pas0000294. Psychol Assess. 2016. PMID: 27537003 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Unblinding on Participants' Perceptions of Risk and Confidence in a Large Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):369-74. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0246. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26114161 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22618581 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous