Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;48(5):396-401.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d68859.

The effect of alcohol treatment on social costs of alcohol dependence: results from the COMBINE study

Affiliations

The effect of alcohol treatment on social costs of alcohol dependence: results from the COMBINE study

Gary A Zarkin et al. Med Care. 2010 May.

Abstract

Background: The COMBINE (combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral intervention) clinical trial recently evaluated the efficacy of pharmacotherapies, behavioral therapies, and their combinations for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Previously, the cost and cost-effectiveness of COMBINE have been studied. Policy makers, patients, and nonalcohol-dependent individuals may be concerned not only with alcohol treatment costs but also with the effect of alcohol interventions on broader social costs and outcomes.

Objectives: To estimate the sum of treatment costs plus the costs of health care utilization, arrests, and motor vehicle accidents for the 9 treatments in COMBINE 3 years postrandomization.

Research design: A cost study based on a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Subjects: : The study involved 786 participants 3 years postrandomization.

Results: Multivariate results show no significant differences in mean costs between any of the treatment arms as compared with medical management (MM) + placebo for the 3-year postrandomization sample. The median costs of MM + acamprosate, MM + naltrexone, MM + acamprosate + naltrexone, and MM + acamprosate + combined behavioral intervention were significantly lower than the median cost for MM + placebo.

Conclusions: The results show that social cost savings are generated relative to MM + placebo by 3 years postrandomization, and the magnitude of these cost savings is greater than the costs of the COMBINE treatment received 3 years prior. Our study suggests that several alcohol treatments may indeed lead to reduced median social costs associated with health care, arrests, and motor vehicle accidents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harwood H. Report prepared by The Lewin Group for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 2000. Updating Estimates of the Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Update Methods, and Data.
    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238–1245. - PubMed
    1. Grant BF, Dawson DA, Stinson FS, et al. The 12-month prevalence and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74(3):223–234. - PubMed
    1. Anton RF, O’Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al. for the COMBINE Study Research Group. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2003–2017. - PubMed
    1. Zarkin GA, Bray JW, Mitra D, et al. J Stud Alcohol. Supplement No. 15. 2005. Jul, Cost methodology of COMBINE; pp. 50–55. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms