Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;31(3):209-15.
doi: 10.1007/s13277-010-0032-x.

Combined use of biomarkers for detection of ovarian cancer in high-risk women

Affiliations
Free article

Combined use of biomarkers for detection of ovarian cancer in high-risk women

Martin Donach et al. Tumour Biol. 2010 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the negative predictive value for a panel of serum markers in women at high risk for developing ovarian cancer. A total of 201 serum samples were collected and analyzed from 102 women at "high risk" for ovarian cancer: 26 with primary ovarian cancer, 31 with recurrent ovarian cancer, 28 with benign gynecologic diseases, and 14 with other cancers. Samples were tested for cancer antigen (CA) 125 II, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA15-3, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor, OVX1, and the marker values were further used as input to be evaluated by a previously trained artificial neural network (ANN). CA125 alone identified 72% of the primary ovarian cancers at a specificity of 95%. If either CA125 or CA72-4 were elevated, sensitivity rose to 80%. Adding macrophage colony-stimulating factor-improved sensitivity to 84% and when CA15-3 was included, a sensitivity of 88% was achieved. Specificity of the four marker panel was, however, reduced to 82.5%. By contrast, at the same sensitivity of 88%, the ANN exhibited a much higher specificity at 92.5% (p = 0.0105). Our data suggest that the combined use of multiple biomarkers improve sensitivity in women at high risk for ovarian cancer. In contrast to the simple "or" combination rule, the ANN was able to achieve a higher sensitivity without significant loss in specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):675-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;165(5 Pt 1):1356-62 - PubMed
    1. Gynecol Oncol. 1988 May;30(1):7-14 - PubMed
    1. Gynecol Oncol. 1987 Sep;28(1):61-7 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1991 Aug 1;51(15):4012-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources