The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction
- PMID: 20395795
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181dba892
The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction
Abstract
Tissue expander/implant breast reconstructions by 5 surgeons at a single institution from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively identified and divided into 2 cohorts: use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM, n = 75) versus standard submuscular placement (n = 52). The ADM group had a statistically significant higher rate of infection (28.9% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.022), reoperation (25.0% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.011), expander explantation (19.2% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.020), and overall complications (46.2% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.007). When stratifying by breast size, a higher complication rate was not observed with the use of ADM in breasts less than 600 g, whereas ADM use in breasts larger than 600 g was associated with a statistically significant higher rate of infection when controlling for the occurrence of skin necrosis. The ADM cohort had a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill volume (256 mL vs. 74 mL, P < 0.001) and a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill ratio (49% vs. 17%, P < 0.001). Further work is needed to define the ideal patient population for ADM use in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f6765. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 21862915
-
Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?Ann Plast Surg. 2012 May;68(5):425-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 21825969
-
Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings.Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):347-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d97. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22868313
-
Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Dec;64(12):1553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 8. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011. PMID: 21388901 Review.
-
Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0213-2. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 24091489 Review.
Cited by
-
Florid pustular dermatitis of breast: A case report on a unusual complication from acellular dermal matrix use.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;22:59-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016. PMID: 27058152 Free PMC article.
-
Plastic Surgery and Acellular Dermal Matrix: Highlighting Trends from 1999 to 2013.World J Plast Surg. 2016 May;5(2):97-108. World J Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 27579264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
To acellular dermal matrix or not to acellular dermal matrix?-outcomes of pre-pectoral prosthetic reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix.Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):885-896. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-23. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Gland Surg. 2024. PMID: 39015692 Free PMC article.
-
Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eplasty. 2011;11:e40. Epub 2011 Nov 3. Eplasty. 2011. PMID: 22084645 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction: Review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome.World J Clin Cases. 2023 Apr 6;11(10):2201-2212. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2201. World J Clin Cases. 2023. PMID: 37122510 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical