Increased whole-body adiposity without a concomitant increase in liver fat is not associated with augmented metabolic dysfunction

Abstract

Aim of this study was to determine whether an increase in adiposity, without a concomitant increase in intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) content, is associated with a deterioration in metabolic function. To this end, multiorgan insulin sensitivity, assessed by using a two-stage hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp procedure in conjunction with stable isotopically labeled tracer infusion, and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) kinetics, assessed by using stable isotopically labeled tracer infusion and mathematical modeling, were determined in 10 subjects with class I obesity (BMI: 31.6 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2); 37 +/- 2% body fat; visceral adipose tissue (VAT): 1,225 +/- 144 cm(3)) and 10 subjects with class III obesity (BMI: 41.5 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2); 43 +/- 2% body fat; VAT: 2,121 +/- 378 cm(3)), matched on age, sex, and IHTG content (14 +/- 4 and 14 +/- 3%, respectively). No differences between class I and class III obese groups were detected in insulin-mediated suppression of palmitate (67 +/- 3 and 65 +/- 3%, respectively; P = 0.635) and glucose (67 +/- 3 and 73 +/- 5%, respectively; P = 0.348) rates of appearance in plasma, and the insulin-mediated increase in glucose disposal (218 +/- 18 and 193 +/- 30%, respectively; P = 0.489). In addition, no differences between class I and class III obese groups were detected in secretion rates of VLDL-triglyceride (6.5 +/- 1.0 and 6.0 +/- 1.4 micromol/l x min, respectively; P = 0.787) and VLDL-apolipoprotein B-100 (0.40 +/- 0.05 and 0.41 +/- 0.04 nmol/l x min, respectively; P = 0.866), and plasma clearance rates of VLDL-triglyceride (31 (16-59) and 29 (18-46) ml/min, respectively; P = 0.888) and VLDL-apolipoprotein B-100 (15 (11-19) and 17 (11-25) ml/min, respectively; P = 0.608). We conclude that increased adiposity without a concomitant increase in IHTG content does not cause additional abnormalities in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and hepatic insulin sensitivity, or VLDL metabolism.

Figure 1

Insulin-induced suppression of glycerol, palmitate and glucose rates of appearance (Ra) and insulin-induced stimulation of glucose rate of disappearance (Rd) in subjects with class I and III obesity, matched on intrahepatic triglyceride content. Values are means ± SEM. There are no significant differences between groups.

Figure 2

Basal very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglyceride (TG) and apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) kinetics in subjects with class I and III obesity, matched on intrahepatic triglyceride content. Values are means ± SEM, except for plasma clearance rates which are means and 95% confidence intervals. There are no significant differences between groups.