Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome
- PMID: 20398449
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome
Abstract
Aim: To review the global select data on the current technique, perioperative outcome and literature on the robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP).
Methods: The published English literature (PubMed) was extensively searched using the key words; robot, robot-assisted pyeloplasty, laparoscopy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The selected studies were then reviewed, tracked and analyzed in order to determine the current role, outcome and status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Results: The search yielded about 25 published series on RAP comprising about 740 cases with a mean operative time, estimated blood loss, crossing vessel prevalence, hospital stay,perioperative complication rate and follow up duration of 194 min, 50 mL, 47%, 2.3 days, 6% and 14.9 months respectively.
Conclusion: The initial peri-operative results and intermediate follow up of cases of repair of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction with robot-assisted pyeloplasty appear to be favorable and comparable to that of open pyeloplasty, while long term outcome data is still awaited. The da Vinci surgical robotic system is a promising surgical armamentarium in the hands of the modern day urologist for the minimally invasive definitive surgical management of both primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19519760 Review.
-
Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status.Int J Med Robot. 2007 Mar;3:35-40. doi: 10.1002/rcs.122. Int J Med Robot. 2007. PMID: 17441024 Review.
-
Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.059. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 17070302
-
Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.021. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Urology. 2006. PMID: 16504272
-
Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Oct 24. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22036645
Cited by
-
Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e777. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e777. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019. PMID: 31271586 Free PMC article.
-
[Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty].Urologe A. 2015 May;54(5):703-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3654-6. Urologe A. 2015. PMID: 25391441 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Short-term outcomes comparison of KangDuo 2.0 and Da Vinci Xi in radical cystectomy.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 5;15(1):11739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95382-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40188251 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Passing from open to robotic surgery for dismembered pyeloplasty: a single centre experience.Springerplus. 2014 Oct 3;3:580. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-580. eCollection 2014. Springerplus. 2014. PMID: 25332880 Free PMC article.
-
The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.Urology. 2018 Jan;111:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 21. Urology. 2018. PMID: 28943371 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources