[Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care unit patients given proton pump inhibitor or histamine-2 receptor antagonist for prevention of stress ulcer: a Meta analysis]
- PMID: 20398466
[Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care unit patients given proton pump inhibitor or histamine-2 receptor antagonist for prevention of stress ulcer: a Meta analysis]
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) in intensive care unit patients for stress ulcer prophylaxis.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE (1966 to March 2009), Ebsco and CNKI was made. Two reviewers were assigned to assess the quality of studies and extracted data independently. Six items were evaluated for each trial (patient selection, patient characteristics, randomization, blinding, definition of bleeding and of pneumonia). Disagreements were resolved through discussion. RevMan 4.2.2 software developed by the cochrane collaboration was used for Meta-analysis.
Results: Four series of clinical use involving 771 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of clinically significant bleeding was significantly lower in the PPI group (2.2% vs. 6.8%) as compared to H(2)RA group [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.96, P=0.04]. There was no significant difference of the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (10.0% vs. 9.9%, OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.70, P=0.89) and mortality (14.5% vs. 14.3%,OR 1.17, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.80, P=0.47) between two groups.
Conclusion: In comparison with H(2)RA, PPI is more effective in the prevention of stress ulcer bleeding (SUB) in patients under intensive care. There is no significant difference in the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia and mortality between two groups. There were very few randomized controlled clinical trials on prevention of stress ulcer, and these findings were based on a small number of patients, therefore a steadfast conclusion cannot presently be reached. More randomized, multicenter studies with sufficient sample size are warranted.
Similar articles
-
The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis.Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1197-205. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d69ccf. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20173630
-
Histamine 2 receptor antagonists vs intravenous proton pump inhibitors in a pediatric intensive care unit: a comparison of gastric pH.J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.10.038. J Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18725049 Clinical Trial.
-
[Proton pump inhibitor H2 receptor antagonist].Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Jun;69(6):1032-8. Nihon Rinsho. 2011. PMID: 21688623 Review. Japanese.
-
Stress-related mucosal bleeding in critically ill oncology patients.J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009 Mar;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1078155208094122. Epub 2008 Aug 27. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009. PMID: 18753185 Clinical Trial.
-
When should stress ulcer prophylaxis be used in the ICU?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Apr;15(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832978e0. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19578324 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine Type 2 Receptor Blockers for Preventing Clinically Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Intensive Care: A Population-Based Study.Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):557-566. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 30. Chest. 2018. PMID: 29856970 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical