Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;183(6):2213-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.017.

Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality

Affiliations

Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality

Jonathan L Wright et al. J Urol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Positive surgical margins in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer are associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence. Few data are available on the role of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer specific mortality. Using a large, population based national cancer registry we evaluated the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality associated with margin status.

Materials and methods: The SEER cancer registry data for patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 were used to identify men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Margin status, pathological stage, Gleason grade and postoperative radiation therapy were recorded along with demographic data. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality associated with positive surgical margins.

Results: A total of 65,633 patients comprised the cohort in which 291 (0.44%) prostate cancer specific deaths occurred during an average followup of 50 months. Positive surgical margins were reported in 21.2% of cases and were more common in pT3a than pT2 tumors (44% vs 18%, p <0.001) and higher grade tumors (28% vs 18%, p <0.001). The 7-year disease specific survival rates for those at highest risk for prostate cancer specific mortality (higher grade pT3a) were 97.6% for cases with negative surgical margins and 92.4% for those with positive surgical margins. Positive surgical margins were associated with a 2.6-fold increased unadjusted risk of prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 2.55, 95% CI 2.02-3.21). Positive surgical margins remained an independent predictor of prostate cancer specific mortality on multivariate analysis (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.32-2.18).

Conclusions: These data demonstrate the independent role of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer specific mortality. These findings support the importance of optimizing surgical techniques to achieve a sound oncological surgical outcome with negative surgical margins when possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan Meier prostate-cancer specific survival plots stratified by surgical margin status (p < 0.001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier prostate-cancer specific survival plots stratified by (a) pathologic stage and surgical margin status; (b) pathologic grade and surgical margin status; (c) pathologic stage, grade and surgical margin status. All p-value < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier prostate-cancer specific survival plots stratified by (a) pathologic stage and surgical margin status; (b) pathologic grade and surgical margin status; (c) pathologic stage, grade and surgical margin status. All p-value < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier prostate-cancer specific survival plots stratified by (a) pathologic stage and surgical margin status; (b) pathologic grade and surgical margin status; (c) pathologic stage, grade and surgical margin status. All p-value < 0.001.

Comment in

References

    1. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, Litwin MS, Latini DM, Du Chane J, et al. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1938–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggener SE, Vickers AJ, Serio AM, Donovan MJ, Khan FM, Bayer-Zubek V, et al. Comparison of models to predict clinical failure after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2009;115(2):303–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freedland SJ, Amling CL, Dorey F, Kane CJ, Presti JC, Jr, Terris MK, et al. Race as an outcome predictor after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Urology. 2002;60(4):670–4. - PubMed
    1. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ, Jr, Dotan ZA, DiBlasio CJ, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7005–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suardi N, Porter CR, Reuther AM, Walz J, Kodama K, Gibbons RP, et al. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1254–63. - PubMed

Publication types