Appraising quantitative research in health education: guidelines for public health educators
- PMID: 20400654
- PMCID: PMC3012621
- DOI: 10.1177/1524839909353023
Appraising quantitative research in health education: guidelines for public health educators
Abstract
Many practicing health educators do not feel they possess the skills necessary to critically appraise quantitative research. This publication is designed to help provide practicing health educators with basic tools helpful to facilitate a better understanding of quantitative research. This article describes the major components- title, introduction, methods, analyses, results, and discussion sections-of quantitative research. Readers will be introduced to information on the various types of study designs and seven key questions health educators can use to facilitate the appraisal process. On reading, health educators will be in a better position to determine whether research studies are well designed and executed.
Similar articles
-
Appraising qualitative research in health education: guidelines for public health educators.Health Promot Pract. 2010 Sep;11(5):612-7. doi: 10.1177/1524839910363537. Health Promot Pract. 2010. PMID: 20817630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0572-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 30359226 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education.Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):71-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590400016308. Med Teach. 2005. PMID: 16147774
-
Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research.Br J Nurs. 2007 Jun 14-27;16(11):658-63. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681. Br J Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17577184 Review.
Cited by
-
Community-Led Total Sanitation: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Evidence and Its Quality.Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Feb 2;126(2):026001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1965. Environ Health Perspect. 2018. PMID: 29398655 Free PMC article.
-
Appraising qualitative research in health education: guidelines for public health educators.Health Promot Pract. 2010 Sep;11(5):612-7. doi: 10.1177/1524839910363537. Health Promot Pract. 2010. PMID: 20817630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature.Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Feb 17;6:19-51. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S51658. eCollection 2015. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015. PMID: 25733941 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Quantitative Approach to Data Collection and Analysis of ECHO Programs Focused on Cancer Care.J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jul 17;12:23821205251358088. doi: 10.1177/23821205251358088. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025. PMID: 40689381 Free PMC article.
-
Parents' knowledge of their child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: An interpretative synthesis.J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1111/jar.12740. Epub 2020 May 5. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020. PMID: 32367663 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Donnelly RA. The Complete Idiots Guide to Statistics. Alpha Books; New York, NY: 2004. pp. 6–7.
-
- Johnson RB, Onwuegbuze AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 2004;33:14–26.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources