Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer
- PMID: 20400716
- PMCID: PMC3245689
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq121
Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based guidelines recommend radical cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, many patients receive alternate therapies, such as chemotherapy or radiation. We examined factors that are associated with the use of radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer and compared the survival outcomes of patients with invasive bladder cancer by the treatment they received.
Methods: From linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified a cohort of 3262 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older at diagnosis with stage II muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 2002. We examined the use of radical cystectomy with multilevel multivariable models and survival after diagnosis with the use of instrumental variable analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: A total of 21% of the study subjects underwent radical cystectomy. Older age at diagnosis and higher comorbidity were associated with decreased odds of receiving cystectomy (for those > or = 80 vs 66-69 years old, odds ratio [OR] = 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07 to 0.14; for Charlson comorbidity index of 3 vs 0-1, OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.45). Long travel distance to an available surgeon was associated with decreased odds of receiving cystectomy (for >50 vs 0-4 miles travel distance to an available surgeon, OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.98). Overall survival was better for those who underwent cystectomy compared with those who underwent alternative treatments (for chemotherapy and/or radiation vs cystectomy, hazard ratio of death = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.3 to 1.8; for surveillance vs cystectomy, hazard ratio of death = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.6 to 2.3; 5-year adjusted survival: 42.2% [95% CI = 39.1% to 45.4%] for cystectomy; 20.7% [95% CI = 18.7% to 22.8%] for chemotherapy and/or radiation; 14.5% [95% CI = 13.0% to 16.2%] for surveillance).
Conclusions: Guideline-recommended care with radical cystectomy is underused for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Many bladder cancer patients whose survival outcomes might benefit with surgery are receiving alternative less salubrious treatments.
Figures
Comment in
-
Words of Wisdom. Re: use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.Eur Urol. 2011 Feb;59(2):301. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.008. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21414877 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
-
- Montie JE, Clark PE, Eisenberger MA, et al. Bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(1):8–39. - PubMed
-
- Schoenberg MP, Gonzalgo ML. Management of invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006. pp. 2468–2478.
-
- Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Wei JT. The regionalization of radical cystectomy to specific medical centers. J Urol. 2005;174(4, pt 1):1385–1389. discussion 1389. - PubMed
-
- Montie JE, Abrahams NA, Bahnson RR, et al. Bladder cancer. Clinical guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4(10):984–1014. - PubMed
