Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up
- PMID: 20401753
- PMCID: PMC2903180
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1000-1
Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up
Abstract
Drilling of the femoral tunnel with the transtibial (TT) technique is widely used in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Recent studies suggest higher knee stability with the use of the anteromedial portal (AMP). The purpose of this study was to compare functional and clinical outcomes of BPTB ACL reconstruction using the TT or the AMP technique for drilling the femoral tunnel. All ACL reconstructions between January 2003 and April 2006 were approached for eligibility. Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria (21 TT group and 26 AMP group). Blinded assessments of IKDC score, knee stability and range of motion, one-leg hop test, mid-quadriceps circumference, VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and SF-12 questionnaire were obtained for both groups. Data on preoperative and postoperative surgical timing were retrospectively reviewed through the charts. The AMP group demonstrated a significantly lower recovery time from surgery to walking without crutches (p < 0.01), to return to normal life (p < 0.03), to return jogging (p < 0.03), to return training (p < 0.03), and to return to play (p < 0.03). Knee stability values measured with KT-1000, Lachman test, pivot-shift sign, and objective IKDC score assessments were significantly better for the AMP compared to TT group (p < 0.002, p < 0.03, p < 0.02, p < 0.015, respectively). No differences were found for VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm, Tegner, and SF-12 between both groups. The use of the AMP technique significantly improved the anterior-posterior and rotational knee stability, IKDC scores, and recovery time from surgery compared to the TT technique.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comments on Alentorn-Geli et al.: Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1367. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1114-5. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Int Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20734042 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to: comments on Alentorn-Geli et al.: anteromedial portal (AMP) versus transtibial (TT) drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2011 Mar;35(3):453-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1135-0. Epub 2010 Oct 21. Int Orthop. 2011. PMID: 20959980 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2009) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traum Arthrosc. Nov. 10 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0964-0 - PubMed
-
- Arnold MP, Kooloos J, Kampen A. Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:194–199. - PubMed
-
- Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:722–728. - PubMed
-
- Bach BR. Arthroscopy assisted patellar tendon substitution for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1989;2:3–20.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
