Anthropometry and standards for wheeled mobility: an international comparison
- PMID: 20402047
- DOI: 10.1080/10400430903520280
Anthropometry and standards for wheeled mobility: an international comparison
Abstract
Space requirements for accommodating wheeled mobility devices and their users in the built environment are key components of standards for accessible design. These requirements typically include dimensions for clear floor areas, maneuvering clearances, seat and knee clearance heights, as well as some reference dimensions on wheeled mobility device sizes. Recent research from four countries was reviewed and compared with their prevailing accessibility standards to identify needs for improving standards. Findings from ongoing anthropometry research on wheeled mobility in the U.S. were used for evaluating the adequacy of existing U.S. accessibility standards. Preliminary analysis suggests that the U.S. standards, which are based on research conducted in the 1970s, need to be updated to address advances in wheeled mobility technology and changes in user demographics. The analysis highlights the importance of integrating research with standards development, organizing international collaborations, and developing international standards.
Similar articles
-
Space requirements for wheeled mobility. Preface.Assist Technol. 2010 Spring;22(1):1-2. doi: 10.1080/10400430903501371. Assist Technol. 2010. PMID: 20402042 No abstract available.
-
Design of built environments to accommodate mobility scooter users: part II.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):432-9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.549898. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011. PMID: 21657823
-
Design features that affect the maneuverability of wheelchairs and scooters.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.009. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20434614
-
Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 17;156(2):141-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22250145 Review.
-
A systematic review of public transport accessibility for people using mobility devices.Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2253-2267. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 31800337
Cited by
-
Revisiting Clear Floor Area Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Device Users in Public Transportation.Transp Res Rec. 2018 Jul;2672(8):675-685. doi: 10.1177/0361198118787082. Transp Res Rec. 2018. PMID: 33762797 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Feb;14(2):109-121. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1401128. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019. PMID: 29130752 Free PMC article.
-
Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Devices in Public Transportation: An Analysis of Clear Floor Space Requirements: (Investing in Accessible Transportation and Mobility ABE60).Transp Res Rec. 2010;2145(1):66-71. doi: 10.3141/2145-08. Transp Res Rec. 2010. PMID: 34421187 Free PMC article.
-
Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062840. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33802242 Free PMC article.
-
Lack of research-based standards for accessible housing: problematization and exemplification of consequences.Int J Public Health. 2011 Dec;56(6):635-44. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0290-4. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Int J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21901334
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources