A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants
- PMID: 20403303
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03262718
A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate fissure sealants based on Bis-GMA [Fissurit F (FF) and Fissurit FX (FFX)], compomer [Dyract Seal (DS)] and ormocer [Admira Seal (AS)] with respect to retention, marginal integrity and presence of caries after a 2-year period of follow-up.
Methods: 80 children aged 7-13 years (mean age: 9.4 + 1.3 years), were included, giving a total of 320 first permanent molars for the study units. Clinical evaluation of the sealants was carried out to assess retention, marginal integrity and presence of caries at 12 and 24 months after initial treatment.
Results: Retention of compomer-based DS sealant was significantly lower than that of the others at the 12- and 24-month follow-up examinations (12 month, P<0.000; 24 month, P<0.006). No significant differences between the sealants were observed in marginal integrity (12 month, P>0.473; 24 month, P>0.069) or presence of caries (12 month, P>0.055; 24 month, P>0.777) at any follow-up examination.
Conclusion: While sealants composed of different resin matrices showed differences in retention, they were similar with respect to marginal integrity and presence of caries. Surface conditioning and the organic structure of the material are factors that may affect sealant retention.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Assessment of Compomers and Ormocers as Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars among Children Aged 7-9 Years.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;17(7):742-747. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2954. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 39372526 Free PMC article.
-
A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):263-7. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.38761uwwm7kpj616. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013. PMID: 23855170 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite-based fissure sealant: two-year results.Oper Dent. 2004 May-Jun;29(3):254-60. Oper Dent. 2004. PMID: 15195724 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An In Vivo Study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1151-1158. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019. PMID: 31883249 Clinical Trial.
-
Dental Sealants Part 3: Which material? Efficiency and effectiveness.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Sep;19(3):247-249. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.03.15. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018. PMID: 30063160 Review.
Cited by
-
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28759120 Free PMC article.
-
Microleakage of pit and fissure sealings placed after enamel conditioning with phosphoric acid or with self-etching primers/adhesives.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Oct;7(5):763-771. doi: 10.1002/cre2.420. Epub 2021 Apr 7. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021. PMID: 33829669 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Dent. 2022 Feb 8;19:10. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022. Front Dent. 2022. PMID: 35937149 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Assessment of Compomers and Ormocers as Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars among Children Aged 7-9 Years.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;17(7):742-747. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2954. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 39372526 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous