Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;125(5):1003-9.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2283. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines

Andrew N Hashikawa  1 , Young J Juhn, Mark Nimmer, Kristen Copeland, Li Shun-Hwa, Pippa Simpson, Martha W Stevens, David C Brousseau
Affiliations

Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines

Andrew N Hashikawa et al. Pediatrics. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: No study has evaluated the association between state endorsement of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Public Health Association (APHA) national guidelines and unnecessary exclusion decisions. We sought to determine the rate of unnecessary exclusion decisions by child care directors in a state that endorses AAP/APHA guidelines and to identify factors that are associated with higher unnecessary exclusion decisions.

Methods: A telephone survey was administered to directors in metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Directors were randomly sampled from a list of 971 registered centers. Director, center, and neighborhood characteristics were obtained. Directors reported whether immediate exclusion was indicated for 5 vignettes that featured children with mild illness that do not require exclusion by AAP/APHA guidelines. Weighted data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with directors' exclusion decisions.

Results: A total of 305 directors completed the survey. Overall, directors would unnecessarily exclude 57% of children. More than 62% had never heard of the AAP/APHA guidelines. Regression analysis showed fewer exclusions among more experienced compared with less experienced directors, among larger centers compared with smaller centers, and among centers that were located in areas with a higher percentage of female heads of household. Centers with < or =10% children on state-assisted tuition excluded more.

Conclusions: High rates of inappropriate exclusion persist despite state endorsement of AAP/APHA guidelines. Focused initial and ongoing training of directors regarding AAP/APHA guidelines may help to reduce high rates of unnecessary exclusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of child care center director study enrollment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percent of children unnecessarily excluded when director responses compared with AAP/APHA guidelines.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Census Bureau. Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring. 2005. [Accessed May 27, 2009]. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/child/ppl-2005.html.
    1. National Survey of Children’s Health. Maternal and Child Health Bureau. 2007. [Accessed May 26, 2009]. Available at: http://nschdata.org.
    1. Bell DM, Gleiber DW, Mercer AA, et al. Illness associated with child day care: a study of incidence and cost. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(4):479–484. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landis SE, Earp JA, Sharp M. Day-care center exclusion of sick children: comparison of opinions of day-care staff, working mothers, and pediatricians. Pediatrics. 1988;81(5):662–667. - PubMed
    1. Cordell RL, MacDonald JK, Solomon SL, Jackson LA, Boase J. Illnesses and absence due to illness among children attending child care facilities in Seattle-King County, Washington. Pediatrics. 1997;100(5):850–855. - PubMed

MeSH terms