Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):488-96, W174.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00005.

Rosuvastatin for primary prevention in older persons with elevated C-reactive protein and low to average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: exploratory analysis of a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rosuvastatin for primary prevention in older persons with elevated C-reactive protein and low to average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: exploratory analysis of a randomized trial

Robert J Glynn et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Randomized data on statins for primary prevention in older persons are limited, and the relative hazard of cardiovascular disease associated with an elevated cholesterol level weakens with advancing age.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in persons 70 years or older.

Design: Secondary analysis of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: 1315 sites in 26 countries randomly assigned participants in JUPITER.

Participants: Among the 17 802 participants randomly assigned with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels less than 3.37 mmol/L (<130 mg/dL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg/L or more without cardiovascular disease, 5695 were 70 years or older.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 20 mg of rosuvastatin daily or placebo.

Measurements: The primary end point was the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes).

Results: The 32% of trial participants 70 years or older accrued 49% (n = 194) of the 393 confirmed primary end points. The rates of the primary end point in this age group were 1.22 and 1.99 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.82]; P < 0.001). Corresponding rates of all-cause mortality in this age group were 1.63 and 2.04 (hazard ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.62 to 1.04]; P = 0.090). Although no significant heterogeneity was found in treatment effects by age, absolute reductions in event rates associated with rosuvastatin were greater in older persons. The relative rate of any serious adverse event among older persons in the rosuvastatin versus placebo group was 1.05 (CI, 0.93 to 1.17).

Limitation: Effect estimates from this exploratory analysis with age cut-point chosen after trial completion should be viewed in the context of the overall trial results.

Conclusion: In apparently healthy older persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, rosuvastatin reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events.

Primary funding source: AstraZeneca.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progress of randomization and participation in the JUPITER trial by age group. Randomization was not stratified by age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2a. Cumulative incidence of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes) by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2b. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including myocardial infarction, stroke or any death by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2c. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes), venous thromboembolism or any death by time, treatment, and age group
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2a. Cumulative incidence of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes) by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2b. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including myocardial infarction, stroke or any death by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2c. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes), venous thromboembolism or any death by time, treatment, and age group
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2a. Cumulative incidence of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes) by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2b. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including myocardial infarction, stroke or any death by time, treatment, and age group Figure 2c. Cumulative incidence of the composite end point including the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes), venous thromboembolism or any death by time, treatment, and age group
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the effect of rosuvastatin on the primary end point within subgroups of trial participants aged 70 years of age or older. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are plotted.

Comment in

References

    1. DeWilde S, Carey IM, Bremner SA, Richards N, Hilton SR, Cook DG. Evolution of statin prescribing 1994–2001: a case of agism but not of sexism? Heart. 2003;89:417–421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ko DT, Mamdani M, Alter DA. Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. JAMA. 2004;291:1864–1870. - PubMed
    1. Setoguchi S, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Levin R, Winkelmayer WC. Ten-year trends of cardiovascular drug use after myocardial infarction among community-dwelling persons > or =65 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1061–7. - PubMed
    1. Abramson J, Wright JM. Are lipid-lowering guidelines evidence based? Lancet. 2007;369:168–169. - PubMed
    1. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007;370:1829–1839. Erratum in: Lancet. 2008; 372:292. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms