Potential component Allee effects and their impact on wetland management in the conservation of endangered anurans
- PMID: 20404930
- PMCID: PMC2852421
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010102
Potential component Allee effects and their impact on wetland management in the conservation of endangered anurans
Abstract
Effective management of wetland quantity and quality is crucial for effective conservation of declining amphibian populations. In particular, frogs and toads that employ aggregative breeding strategies may suffer negative population impacts in response to changes in availability of aquatic breeding habitat, including overabundance of suitable habitat, if density of conspecifics attending aggregations is positively correlated with reproductive success. Here we document such a positive relationship, potentially the first example of a component Allee effect in an anuran, in the critically endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis). We assessed the relationship between mean yearly chorus size and reproductive success of males at the pond level using an information theoretic model selection approach and a two-sample t-test. The chosen model contained the single variable of mean yearly chorus size to predict probability of reproduction, as selected using the Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size and Akaike weight. Mean chorus sizes were significantly higher among ponds exhibiting evidence of reproduction than in those that showed no evidence of reproduction. Our results suggest that chorusing alone is a poor proxy for inference of population stability and highlight a need for reassessment of widely-used amphibian monitoring protocols. Further, amphibian conservation efforts should account for potential Allee effects in order to optimize benefits and avoid underestimating critical population thresholds, particularly in species exhibiting rapid population declines.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Testing wetland features to increase amphibian reproductive success and species richness for mitigation and restoration.Ecol Appl. 2012 Jul;22(5):1675-88. doi: 10.1890/11-0212.1. Ecol Appl. 2012. PMID: 22908722
-
We Made Your Bed, Why Won't You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159143. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27463095 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting breeding habitat for amphibians: a spatiotemporal analysis across Yellowstone National Park.Ecol Appl. 2011 Oct;21(7):2530-47. doi: 10.1890/10-1261.1. Ecol Appl. 2011. PMID: 22073642
-
Impacts of human-induced environmental change in wetlands on aquatic animals.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):529-554. doi: 10.1111/brv.12358. Epub 2017 Sep 19. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018. PMID: 28929570 Review.
-
Do hormone-modulating chemicals impact on reproduction and development of wild amphibians?Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Nov;90(4):1100-17. doi: 10.1111/brv.12147. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015. PMID: 25335651 Review.
References
-
- Semlitsch RD. Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv Biol. 2002;16:619–629.
-
- Smith AM, Green DM. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: Are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography. 2005;28:110–128.
-
- Marsh DM, Trenham PC. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:40–49.
-
- Duellman WE, Trueb L. Biology of amphibians. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1986. 670
-
- Wells KD. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 1977;25:666–693.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources