Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Jun;117(7):777-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02561.x. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review of the effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments

L van Lonkhuijzen et al. BJOG. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Training of healthcare workers can play an important role in improving quality of care, and reducing maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of training programmes aimed at improving emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments.

Search strategy: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Popline and selected websites, and manually searched bibliographies of selected articles. Language was not an exclusion criterion.

Selection criteria: All papers describing postgraduate training programmes aimed at improving emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and classified these according to the level of the measured effects (reaction of participants, improved knowledge and skills, changes in behaviour and outcomes in practice). Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author until agreement was reached.

Main results: A total of 38 papers were selected. Training programmes vary considerably in length, content and design. The evaluation of effects is often hampered by inadequate study design and the use of non-validated measuring instruments. Most papers describe positive reactions, increased knowledge and skills, and improved behaviour after training. Outcome is assessed less frequently, and positive effects are not always demonstrated. Measures that can contribute to a positive effect of training programmes include hands-on practise, team approaches and follow-up on training efforts.

Author's conclusions: Training programmes may improve quality of care, but strong evidence is lacking. Policymakers need to include evaluation and reporting of effects in project budgets for new training programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources