Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;186(4):900-910.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03252.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change

Affiliations

Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change

Xavier Morin et al. New Phytol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

*Because the phenology of trees is strongly driven by environmental factors such as temperature, climate change has already altered the vegetative and reproductive phenology of many species, especially in the temperate zone. Here, we aimed to determine whether projected levels of warming for the upcoming decades will lead to linear changes in the phenology of trees or to more complex responses. *We report the results of a 3-yr common garden experiment designed to study the phenological response to artificial climate change, obtained through experimental warming and reduced precipitation, of several populations of three European oaks, two deciduous species (Quercus robur, Quercus pubescens) and one evergreen species (Quercus ilex), in a Mediterranean site. *Experimental warming advanced the seedlings' vegetative phenology, causing a longer growing season and higher mortality. However, the rate of advancement of leaf unfolding date was decreased with increasing temperature. Conversely, soil water content did not affect the phenology of the seedlings or their survival. *Our results show that the phenological response of trees to climate change may be nonlinear, and suggest that predictions of phenological changes in the future should not be built on extrapolations of current observed trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahas R, Aasa A, Menzel A, Fedotova VG, Scheifinger H. 2002. Changes in European spring phenology. International Journal of Climatology 22: 1727-1738.
    1. Ahas R, Jaagus J, Aasa A. 2000. The phenological calendar of Estonia and its correlation with mean air temperature. International Journal of Biometeorology 44: 159-166.
    1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (face)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytologist 165: 351-371.
    1. Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH et al. 1999. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecological Monographs 69: 491-511.
    1. Asshoff R, Zotz G, Korner C. 2006. Growth and phenology of mature temperate forest trees in elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 12: 848-861.

Publication types